The Optimal Duration of pH Monitoring: Testing the Validity of Lyon 2.0 Recommendations for Wireless pH Measurement.

Background & Aims: The Lyon 2.0 consensus recommends 96-hour wireless pH studies for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) diagnosis; however, the optimal length of pH measurement has not been established. Further, it is uncertain if, and under what circumstances, shorter recording times are sufficient for a conclusive diagnosis.

The Multichannel Intraoesophageal Impedance Transit Concept.

Introduction/aims The multichannel intraoesophageal impedance transit (MIIT) is a new clinical concept that is being introduced to measure the oesophageal transit during a 24-hour multichannel impedance-pH (MII-pH) study. Methods MIIT was tested in a case-control study between January 2020 and December 2023. A laboratory test was first conducted to determine the saline baseline impedance (SBI) using MII-pH catheters.

REsolution of Symptoms afTer Oesophago-gastric cancer REsection delphi (RESTOREd)-standardizing the definition, investigation and management of gastrointestinal symptoms and conditions after surgery.

Background: Oesophago-gastric cancer surgery negatively affects quality of life with a high postoperative symptom burden. Several conditions that may be diagnosed and treated after surgery are recognised. However, consensus regarding their definition and management is lacking.

Automated decision making in Barrett's oesophagus: development and deployment of a natural language processing tool.

Manual decisions regarding the timing of surveillance endoscopy for premalignant Barrett's oesophagus (BO) is error-prone. This leads to inefficient resource usage and safety risks. To automate decision-making, we fine-tuned Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) models to categorize BO length (EndoBERT) and worst histopathological grade (PathBERT) on 4,831 endoscopy and 4,581 pathology reports from Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital (GSTT).

Neural correlates of the experience of ugliness.

Previous studies have shown that the experience of beauty is dependent upon the co-activity of field A1 of the medial frontal cortex and sensory areas. This leaves us with the question of ugliness; are the same neural mechanisms involved in this experience, including neural activity patterns, or are different mechanisms at play? This question arises because ugliness, although often regarded as the opposite of beauty, could possibly be a distinct aesthetic category. Subjects were asked to rate faces according to how ugly they found them to be while their brain activity was measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging.