Background: The European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases aims to enhance the rare diseases research ecosystem by bringing together stakeholders such as research funders, institutions and patient organizations. Work Package 20 focuses on the validation, use and development of innovative methodologies for rare disease clinical trials. This paper reports on the outcomes of a retreat held in April 2023, where areas for innovation and educational needs in rare disease clinical trials were discussed in multi-stakeholder sessions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: In clinical research, the most appropriate way to assess the effect of an intervention is to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT). In the field of rare diseases, conducting an RCT is challenging, resulting in a low rate of clinical trials, with a high frequency of early termination and unpublished trials. The aim of the EPISTOP trial was to compare outcomes in infants with tuberous sclerosis (TSC) who received vigabatrin preventively before the seizures onset with those who received it conventionally after.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF: Of all adverse drug reactions, 35-45% are due to medication errors and would therefore be preventable. Thus, it is essential to implement effective strategies to prevent medication errors. However, it remains unclear whether medication reviews provide an additional benefit compared to medication reconciliation regarding medication safety.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDelayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a severe complication following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), linked to poor functional outcomes and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Timely DCI diagnosis is crucial but remains challenging. Dysregulated blood glucose, commonly observed after aSAH, may impair the constant glucose supply that is vital for brain function, potentially contributing to DCI.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: In the context of clinical research, there is an increasing need for new study designs that help to incorporate already available data. With the help of historical controls, the existing information can be utilized to support the new study design, but of course, inclusion also carries the risk of bias in the study results.
Methods: To combine historical and randomized controls we investigate the Fill-it-up-design, which in the first step checks the comparability of the historical and randomized controls performing an equivalence pre-test.