Aim: The performance of therapeutic procedures in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy (LGI) can be challenging and carries an increased risk of adverse events. There is increasing demand for the training of endoscopists in these procedures, but limited guidelines exist concerning procedural competency. The aim of this study was to assess the learning curves for LGI polypectomy, colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: To compare the quality metrics selected for public display on medical wards to patients' and carers' expressed quality priorities.
Methods: Multimodal qualitative evaluation of general medical wards and semi-structured interviews.
Setting: UK tertiary National Health Service (public) hospital.
Objectives: Frontline insights into care delivery correlate with patients' clinical outcomes. These outcomes might be improved through near-real time identification and mitigation of staff concerns. We evaluated the effects of a prospective frontline surveillance system on patient and team outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: To understand how frontline reports of day-to-day care failings might be better translated into improvement.
Design: Qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary team intervention capitalising on the frontline experience of care delivery. Prospective clinical team surveillance (PCTS) involved structured interdisciplinary briefings to capture challenges in care delivery, facilitated organisational escalation of the issues they identified, and feedback.