Publications by authors named "S M Snapinn"

Advances in anticancer therapies have provided crucial benefits for millions of patients who are living long and fulfilling lives. Although these successes should be celebrated, there is certainly room to continue improving cancer care. Increased long-term survival presents additional challenges for determining whether new therapies further extend patients' lives through clinical trials, commonly known as the gold standard endpoint of overall survival (OS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: RBT-1 is a combination drug of stannic protoporfin (SnPP) and iron sucrose (FeS) that elicits a preconditioning response through activation of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and iron-scavenging pathways, as measured by heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and ferritin, respectively. Our primary aim was to determine whether RBT-1 administered before surgery would safely and effectively elicit a preconditioning response in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Methods: This phase 2, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, adaptive trial, conducted in 19 centres across the USA, Canada, and Australia, enrolled patients scheduled to undergo non-emergent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and/or heart valve surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Investigational New Drug (IND) Final Rule (US FDA, Final rule: Investigational new drug safety reporting requirements for human drug and biological products and safety reporting requirements for bioavailability and bioequivalence studies in humans, 2010) applies to all human drugs and biological products being studied under an IND. The Final Rule specifies that a sponsor must file an IND safety report for any Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSAR) of a medicinal product being investigated. To make a proper SUSAR classification, sponsors need to go beyond conventional Data Monitoring Committees (DMCs) with an interdisciplinary effort, using all relevant data (including data outside clinical trials), to make judgments on the possibility of serious adverse events being caused by the study drug-rather than the underlying condition of the patient or a concomitant therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The ASCEND-ND trial raised concerns about daprodustat having a higher risk of cancer-related adverse events compared to darbepoetin in patients with anemia due to chronic kidney disease (CKD), but this was not seen in the dialysis-focused ASCEND-D trial.* -
  • Both trials involved randomizing patients to receive either daprodustat or various types of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), with different dosing schedules, and used statistical models to analyze the safety of the treatments.* -
  • The findings indicated that the perceived increased risk of cancer-related adverse events for daprodustat in ASCEND-ND may have been biased due to under-counting of events in the darbepo
View Article and Find Full Text PDF