Publications by authors named "S Lantheaume"
Purpose: To improve the quality of care for patients with breast cancer, an analysis of the health-care pathway, considering feedback from both health-care practitioners (HCPs) and patients, is needed.
Methods: Between 2020 and 2022, we conducted a survey at French breast cancer centers and analyzed information from questionnaires completed by HCPs and patients. We collected information on center organization, diagnostic processes, treatment decisions and modalities, supportive care, patient advocacy groups, and work issues.
Self-compassion and psychological well-being of radiographers at work.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being
December 2024
Article Synopsis
- - The study aimed to examine how self-compassion impacts the psychological well-being of radiographers in Rhône-Alpes, France, using a mixed-methods approach that included both quantitative and qualitative data.
- - Out of 253 participants, the results indicated that radiographers experienced low well-being and moderate self-compassion, with a notable link between the two, influenced by factors like gender, age, and experience.
- - The findings suggest that special focus should be given to female, younger radiographers with less experience, as self-compassion serves as a protective factor, and recommends promoting training in self-compassion within medical imaging departments.
Background: The Covid-19 pandemic has prompted healthcare professionals to adapt and implement new tools to ensure continuity of patient care. Teleconsultation became the only option for some practitioners who had never used it previously and boosted its use for others who already used it. Several studies have reviewed the use of teleconsultation in oncology during the epidemic, but few have addressed its continued use and how practitioners view it in a post-epidemic period.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: This study investigated the perceptions and feelings of a French sample about the possible introduction of lung cancer screening.
Methods: A total of 146 individuals, aged between 19- and 64-years, participated in this study conducted between November 2020 and January 2021. Participants were divided into three groups according to their smoking status: (i) active smokers (G1); former smokers (G2); and non-smokers (G3).