Objectives: This study sought to ascertain causes of death and the incidence of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related mortality within 30 days.
Background: Public reporting of 30-day mortality after PCI without clearly identifying the cause may result in operator risk avoidance and affect hospital reputation and reimbursements. Death certificates, utilized by previous reports, have poor correlation with actual cause of death and may be inadequate for public reporting.
Objectives: To investigate the safety and risk of vascular complications of arteriotomy closure devices (ACD) with the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Background: ACDs and manual compression have been shown to have a similar risk of complications in the setting of PCI with heparin ± glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor usage. In many centers bivalirudin is becoming the most frequent type of anticoagulation used during PCI.
Background: Coronary stent fracture is an underrecognized entity but has been reported more frequently in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era. Nevertheless, the clinical implications of coronary stent fracture remain unclear.
Methods And Materials: A literature search for reports of DES fracture was conducted via MEDLINE, and the US Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was accessed via the internet and interrogated for reports of stent fracture between January 1, 2003, and April 30, 2008.
Objectives: Our purpose was to examine the incidence of all-cause mortality among drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) while adjusting for many confounding factors generally not considered in prior studies.
Background: DES use in the U.S.
Background: The short-term and long-term safety and efficacy of paclitaxel versus sirolimus-overlapping drug-eluting stents (DES) is unknown. We sought to examine the clinical consequences of overlapping sirolimus versus paclitaxel DES.
Methods: We reviewed catheterization reports from April 2003 to May 2005 for all patients who underwent percutaneous coronary revascularization with DES.
Background: The aim of vascular closure devices is to safely secure the arterial access site at the conclusion of catheterization procedures, thereby increasing patient comfort and decreasing time to hemostasis and ambulation. The FISH (femoral introducer sheath and hemostasis) device is novel in that the access sheath and closure component are incorporated onto the same system.
Methods: The FISH pivotal investigation was conducted at 8 catheterization laboratories throughout the United States.
The high cost of drug-eluting stents (DESs) has made identification of patients who are at low risk for subsequent revascularization after treatment with bare metal stents (BMSs) highly desirable. Previous reports from randomized trials suffer from biases induced by restricted entry criteria and protocol-mandated angiographic follow-up. Between 1994 and 2001, 5,239 consecutive BMS patients, excluding those with coil stents, technical failure, brachytherapy, staged procedure, or stent thrombosis within 30 days, were prospectively identified from a large single-center tertiary-referral-center prospective registry for long-term follow-up.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The use of arteriotomy closure devices (CDs) to achieve hemostasis after femoral artery access in percutaneous coronary intervention is steadily increasing. However, the safety information with these devices in the era of triple antiplatelet therapy is limited.
Methods: We reviewed prospectively collected data from the Do Tirofiban and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcomes Trial (TARGET), where all patients received aspirin, clopidogrel, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy.
Restenosis after stenting, in contrast to balloon angioplasty, is predominantly due to neointima formation. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors diminish neointima formation in animal models of arterial injury. In an observational study, 1,598 patients who were treated from 1994 to 1997 with coronary stents and prospectively followed for clinical events were divided into 2 groups: those receiving ACE inhibitors at the time of stenting (n = 345) and those who did not (n = 1,253).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF