Publications by authors named "Russell D Johnson"

Anharmonic calculations using vibrational perturbation theory are known to provide near-spectroscopic accuracy when combined with high-level ab initio potential energy functions. However, performance with economical, popular electronic structure methods is less well characterized. We compare the accuracy of harmonic and anharmonic predictions from Hartree-Fock, second-order perturbation, and density functional theories combined with 6-31G(d) and 6-31+G(d,p) basis sets.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To predict the vibrational spectra of molecules, ab initio calculations are often used to compute harmonic frequencies, which are usually scaled by empirical factors as an approximate correction for errors in the force constants and for anharmonic effects. Anharmonic computations of fundamental frequencies are becoming increasingly popular. We report scaling factors, along with their associated uncertainties, for anharmonic (second-order perturbation theory) predictions from HF, MP2, and B3LYP calculations using the 6-31G(d) and 6-31+G(d,p) basis sets.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Vibrational zero-point energies (ZPEs) determined from ab initio calculations are often scaled by empirical factors. An empirical scaling factor partially compensates for the effects arising from vibrational anharmonicity and incomplete treatment of electron correlation. These effects are not random but are systematic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Quantum chemistry calculations reveal that it is both thermodynamically and kinetically feasible for NO2 to be oxidized by RDX (1,3,5-trinitrohexahydro-s-triazine) or its initial decomposition products. Thus, NO3 (nitrate radical) may be produced during the thermal decomposition of RDX and other nitramines. However, experimental studies of the gaseous products, by mass spectrometry and microwave spectroscopy, have never detected NO3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Vibrational frequencies determined from ab initio calculations are often scaled by empirical factors. An empirical scaling factor partially compensates for the errors arising from vibrational anharmonicity and incomplete treatment of electron correlation. These errors are not random but are systematic biases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF