Clin Orthop Relat Res
April 2006
Unlabelled: Proximal tibia fractures present a difficult treatment challenge with historically high complication rates. In a prospective study, we asked whether the Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) plate can adequately treat extraarticular and complex intraarticular proximal tibia fractures and provide low complication rates and acceptable long-term functional outcomes. We prospectively observed 25 patients with 26 proximal tibia fractures (AO type A2, A3, C1, C2, or C3) treated with the LISS.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Orthop Relat Res
January 2005
Unlabelled: In a prospective study, 28 patients with 29 proximal humeral fractures were treated with the Locking Proximal Humerus Plate from 2001-2002. Most of these fractures were complex, Type B (n = 15) and Type C (n = 9) fractures, according to the AO classification. Followups included radiographs, clinical examinations, and recording Constant scores.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActa Orthop Scand
February 2004
Background: There is no consensus on the best treatment of distal femoral fractures.
Patients And Methods: In a prospective study, we treated 29 patients with 30 distal femoral fractures with the Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) from 1997 to 2000. Almost 1/2 of them had open fractures, 1/3 extraarticular type A and 2/3 articular fractures type C (AO classification) and these had been caused by high-energy trauma with concomitant severe injuries or osteoporosis.
Background: A biomechanical cadaver study was performed to test the stability and strength of screw osteosynthesis of surgical neck fractures of the humerus.
Methods: After bone density measurement, 64 cadaver proximal humerus bones were bent to create a subcapital fracture. The fracture was then stabilized by means of screw osteosynthesis randomly assigned to subgroups of screw positioning, size of screw, and stress test (torsion/bending).
Acta Orthop Scand
February 2003
In 1996, the AO/ASIF developed the proximal femoral nail (PFN) as an intramedullary device for the treatment of unstable per-, intra- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures. In a prospective study, we treated 55 patients having proximal femoral fractures with the PFN from 1997 to 2000. In 34 patients, we achieved what was close to anatomic reduction of the main fracture fragments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF