HLA-B*40:587 differs from HLA-B*40:02:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 275 in exon 5.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-DRB5*02:02:05 differs from HLA-DRB5*02:02:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 134 in exon 3.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-DRB4*01:182 differs from HLA-DRB4*01:03:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 172 in exon 3.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-DRB1*04:379N differs from HLA-DRB1*04:01:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 4 in exon 1.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-DQA1*05:112 differs from HLA-DQA1*05:05:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon -7 in exon 1.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWe report data on six kidney or heart recipients who were administered daratumumab to treat or prevent antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). To date, data are scarce concerning the use of daratumumab in solid organ transplantation and most reports show a decrease in donor-specific antigen (DSA) levels and an improvement in ABMR using a multiple myeloma daratumumab administration scheme, that is, with sequential systematic administration. Here, we report on the efficacy of daratumumab 1/ in reducing the histological signs of ABMR, 2/ in reducing the ability of DSA to bind to donor cells in vitro through negativation of flow cytometry crossmatching, 3/ in preferentially being directed towards antibodies sharing epitopes, suggesting that daratumumab may specifically target activated plasma cells, 4/ and when administered as a single dose.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-DQB1*02:01:01:21Q differs from HLA-DQB1*02:01:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution in the splice site in the beginning of intron 3.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have recently become the standard of care for many metastatic solid tumors, with considerable improvements in patient prognosis. However, a non-negligible proportion of patients does not respond to this type of treatment, making it essential to identify predictive factors of this response in order to better adapt the therapy. Among the biomarkers that have been most extensively studied in recent years, tumor PD-L1 levels come out on top, with controversial results for predicting response to ICI.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-DPB1*1516:01 differs from HLA-DPB1*1229:01 by seven nucleotide substitutions in exon 3.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-A*32:177 differs from HLA-A*32:01:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon -16 in exon 1.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-B*14:122 differs from HLA-B*14:02:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 102 in exon 3.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-DPA1*02:122 differs from HLA-DPA1*02:01:01:02 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 78 in exon 2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-DRB3*02:194 differs from HLA-DRB3*02:02:01:02 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 78 in exon 2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-B*08:312 differs from HLA-B*08:01:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 324 in exon 6.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-DPA1*01:03:51 differs from HLA-DPA1*01:03:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 146 in exon 3.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-B*39:06:09 differs from HLA-B*39:06:02:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 135 in exon 3.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-DRB1*13:03:13 differs from HLA-DRB1*13:03:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 180 in exon 3.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-C*16:98:02 differs from HLA-C*16:98:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 132 in exon 3.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-DRB1*11:324 differs from HLA-DRB1*11:62:02 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 38 in exon 2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIn solid tumors, three main complementary approaches of adoptive T-cell therapies were successively developed: tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, chimeric antigen receptor engineered T cells, and high-affinity T-cell receptor engineered T cells. In this review, we summarized rational and main results of these three adoptive T-cell therapies in solid tumors field and gave an overview of encouraging data and their limits. Then, we listed the major remaining challenges (including tumor antigen loss, on-target/off-tumor effect, tumor access difficulties and general/local immunosubversion) and their lines of research.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFT cell therapy strategies, from allogeneic stem cell transplantation toward genetically-modified T cells infusion, develop powerful anti-tumor effects but are often accompanied by side effects and their efficacy remains sometimes to be improved. It therefore appears important to provide a flexible and easily reversible gene expression regulation system to control T cells activity. We developed a gene expression regulation technology that exploits the physiological GCN2-ATF4 pathway's ability to induce gene expression in T cells in response to one essential amino acid deficiency.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe impact of immunosuppressive therapy (IS) strategies after kidney transplant failure (KTF) on potential future new grafts is poorly established. We assessed the potential benefit of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based IS maintenance throughout the dialysis period on the outcome of the second kidney transplant (KT). We identified 407 patients who underwent a second KT between January 2008 and December 2018 at four French KT centers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-DRB3*02:193 differs from DRB3*02:02:01:11 by one nucleotide substitution in exon 1, and intronic changes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHLA-B*51:384 differs from HLA-B*51:01:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 267 in exon 4.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF