Publications by authors named "Ron C Bowditch"

Background: The trial results of BD FocalPoint™ GS computer assisted screening(FP) of BD SurePath(®) liquid based cervical cytology slides (SP) were published in Diagnostic Cytopathology in 2012.(1) METHOD: The FP-reviewed SP slides were compared to conventional cervical Pap smears (CON) in a split sample of 2198 routine specimens. In all 47 confirmed high grade (HG) cases, FP either selected fields of view (FOV) containing cells suspicious or diagnostic of HG (46/47), or prompted full screening of the slide (1/47) leading to detection of the HG lesion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

BD FocalPoint GS™ computer-assisted screening of BD SurePath® liquid-based cervical cytology slides (SP + FP) was compared with screening an accompanying conventional cervical Papanicolaou (Pap) smear (CON) in a split sample trial of 2,198 routine specimens. The rate of unsatisfactory specimens in the SP + FP arm was 0.2% compared with 4.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Rapid rescreening (RR) of negative Papanicolaou smears (PS) is used in many countries as a quality-assurance measure. Seeding of abnormal slides has been suggested as a way to increase the sensitivity of this procedure. Since 2004, the authors have carried out RR with seeding before issuing reports.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We compared the performance of the ThinPrep (TP) Imaging System (TIS) with manual reading of TP slides (TPM) and with manual reading of the paired conventional Pap smear (PS) in terms of sensitivity for and positive predictive value (PPV) of high-grade disease and productivity. The study consisted of 11,416 routine PS and paired TP slides as well as 103 confirmed abnormal TP slides. In terms of sensitivity for the detection of biopsy-confirmed high-grade disease, overall there was no statistically significant difference between TIS-screened TP (TPI) and TPM (81.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To determine histologic positive predictive values (PPVs) for three categories of cytologic reports of endocervical glandular abnormalities.

Materials And Methods: We obtained histologic follow-up for 100% of 67 cytologic predictions of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and 82% of 39 predictions of possible AIS (?AIS) made over a 4-year period (1999-2002) and for 25% of 105 atypical endocervical cells (AEC) predictions over a 12-month period (2000). For each category of cytologic report, we determined the histologic yields of high-grade lesions overall and of high-grade glandular lesions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF