[Medicolegal analysis of legal claims in bariatric surgery].

Objectives: To analyse the causes for claims due to alleged malpractice in bariatric surgery and the results of the legal process.

Material And Method: A review was carried out on the case files of claims for damages as a result of bariatric surgery presented to the Professional Liability Department of the Catalonian Medical Colleges Council from 1992 to 2009. The claims rate was calculated using a survey of bariatric surgeons.

[Alleged malpractice claims related to gastrointestinal endoscopy. Analysis of casuistics over 22 years].

We reviewed the records of patients filing alleged malpractice claims related to gastrointestinal endoscopy to the Professional Responsibility Section of the Medical Council of Catalonia from 1987 to 2009 to determine the frequency of medical errors or substandard care in the practice of this procedure and the result of complaints according to whether malpractice might have been involved or not. There were a total of 66 complaints, 46 (70%) after colonoscopy, 12 (18%) after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and eight (12%) after gastroscopy. In 18 (27%) cases, we considered malpractice to have been probable, due to lack of informed consent in four, delayed treatment of complications in six, substandard sedation in five, misdiagnosis in two and substandard practice in one, which would justify the complaints.