Introduction: To identify drivers of preference for growth hormone deficiency (GHD) treatment in French children, and their caregivers, and to quantify the relative importance of different aspects of treatment modalities using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).
Materials And Methods: Attributes characterizing GHD treatment modalities were identified through a literature review, qualitative interviews and focus groups with children, adolescents, and caregivers. A DCE questionnaire of 12 choice tasks was administered online to four groups of participants: autonomous adolescents (12 to 18 years), non-autonomous adolescent / caregiver dyads, caregivers of non-autonomous children (3 to 11 years) and autonomous children / caregiver dyads.
Objective: The objective of this study was to describe in a real-life setting the treatment burden and adherence and quality of life (QOL) of children treated with daily injections of growth hormone and their relationship with treatment duration.
Design: This non-interventional, multicenter, cross-sectional French study involved children aged 3-17 years treated with daily growth hormone injections.
Methods: Based on a recent validated dyad questionnaire, the mean overall life interference total score (100 = most interference) was described, with treatment adherence and QOL, using the Quality of Life of Short Stature Youth questionnaire (100 = best).
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
February 2022
Objective: Efficacy of pharmacological treatments for acromegaly has been assessed in many clinical or real-world studies but no study was interested in economics evaluation of these treatments in France. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate the cost-utility of second-line pharmacological treatments in acromegaly patients.
Methods: A Markov model was developed to follow a cohort of 1,000 patients for a lifetime horizon.
Objective: We report the final analysis of the French ACROSTUDY, using data revised and enriched since the 2013 interim analysis. Our objective was to validate the use of pegvisomant (PEGV) in the treatment of acromegaly and to determine efficacy and safety.
Patients And Methods: Patients with acromegaly treated with PEGV and followed up for at least 5 years were included.
Objective: After surgery, when somatostatin analogs (SAs) do not normalise IGF-I, pegvisomant (PEG) is indicated. Our aim was to define the medical reasons for the treatment of patients with PEG as monotherapy (M) or combined with SA, either as primary bitherapy, PB (PEG is secondarily introduced after SA) or as secondary bitherapy, SB (SAs secondarily introduced after PEG).
Methods: We retrospectively analysed French data from ACROSTUDY.