Influence of multiple stents on periprocedural stroke after carotid artery stenting in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial (CREST).

Background: In the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial (CREST), carotid artery atherosclerotic lesion length and nature of the lesions were important factors that predicted the observed difference in stroke rates between carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting (CAS). Additional patient-related factors influencing CAS outcomes in CREST included age and symptomatic status. The importance of the operator's proficiency and its influence on periprocedural complications have not been well defined.

Long-Term Results of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis.

Background: In the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial, we found no significant difference between the stenting group and the endarterectomy group with respect to the primary composite end point of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during the periprocedural period or any subsequent ipsilateral stroke during 4 years of follow-up. We now extend the results to 10 years.

Methods: Among patients with carotid-artery stenosis who had been randomly assigned to stenting or endarterectomy, we evaluated outcomes every 6 months for up to 10 years at 117 centers.

Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.

Background: Carotid-artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy are both options for treating carotid-artery stenosis, an important cause of stroke.

Methods: We randomly assigned patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis to undergo carotid-artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy. The primary composite end point was stroke, myocardial infarction, or death from any cause during the periprocedural period or any ipsilateral stroke within 4 years after randomization.

The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial: credentialing of interventionalists and final results of lead-in phase.

The success of carotid artery stenting in preventing stroke requires a low risk of periprocedural stroke and death. A comprehensive training and credentialing process was prerequisite to the randomized Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) to assemble a competent team of interventionalists with low periprocedural event rates. Interventionalists submitted cases to a multidisciplinary Interventional Management Committee.

Does sex matter? Thirty-day stroke and death rates after carotid artery stenting in women versus men: results from the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) lead-in phase.

Background And Purpose: Several carotid endarterectomy randomized, controlled trials and series have reported higher perioperative stroke and death rates for women compared with men. The potential for this same relationship with carotid artery stenting was examined in the lead-in phase of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).

Methods: CREST compares efficacy of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in preventing stroke, myocardial infarction, and death in the periprocedural period and ipsilateral stroke over the follow-up period.

Outcome of carotid artery stenting for primary versus restenotic lesions.

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) for restenosis (RS) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is presumed to have fewer complications than CAS for primary atherosclerotic (PA) lesions. It has been proposed that interventionalists may limit themselves to CAS for RS initially, while they gain additional experience during their learning curve. However, there are few studies objectively comparing the outcomes of the two groups of patients to substantiate this assumption.

Endarterectomy vs stenting for carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: The relative efficacy and safety of endarterectomy and stenting in patients with carotid stenosis remain unclear. In this review we synthesize the available evidence derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the two procedures in terms of the risks of death, stroke (disabling and nondisabling), and nonfatal myocardial infarction.

Methods: We searched for RCTs in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, and Cochrane CENTRAL; expert files, and bibliographies of included articles.

Management of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery.

The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) appointed a committee of experts to formulate evidence-based clinical guidelines for the management of carotid stenosis. In formulating clinical practice recommendations, the committee used systematic reviews to summarize the best available evidence and the GRADE scheme to grade the strength of recommendations (GRADE 1 for strong recommendations; GRADE 2 for weak recommendations) and rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, and very low quality). In symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with low-grade carotid stenosis (<50% in symptomatic and <60% in asymptomatic patients), we recommend optimal medical therapy rather than revascularization (GRADE 1 recommendation, high quality evidence).

Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.

Objectives: Ultrasound velocity criteria for the diagnosis of in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) are not well established. In the present study, we test whether ultrasound velocity measurements correlate with increasing degrees of in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing CAS and develop customized velocity criteria to identify residual stenosis > or =20%, in-stent restenosis > or =50%, and high-grade in-stent restenosis > or =80%.

Methods: Carotid angiograms performed at the completion of CAS were compared with duplex ultrasound (DUS) imaging performed immediately after the procedure.

Patterns of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting: classification and implications for long-term outcome.

Objectives: Factors predicting in-stent restenosis (ISR) and future need for target lesion revascularization (TLR) after carotid artery stenting (CAS) remain undetermined. We hypothesized that the patterns of restenotic lesions may provide prognostic information. In this study, we developed an ultrasound classification scheme for ISR based on lesion length and distribution and assessed factors that may predict the need for TLR.

Randomized clinical trials: impact on clinical practice for symptomatic and asymptomatic extracranial carotid occlusive disease.

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as a useful and potentially less invasive alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the treatment of extracranial carotid stenoses. In this regard, it has been suggested that specific patient subgroups who may benefit from CAS including those with significant medical comorbidities, recurrent stenosis, anatomically inaccessible lesions, and a hostile neck. However, the purpose of this report is to evaluate whether or not CAS should replace CEA in the treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic disease in better risk patients, also.

Gaps in public knowledge of peripheral arterial disease: the first national PAD public awareness survey.

Background: Lower-extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with decreased functional status, diminished quality of life, amputation, myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. Nevertheless, public knowledge of PAD as a morbid and mortal disease has not been previously assessed.

Methods And Results: We performed a cross-sectional, population-based telephone survey of a nationally representative sample of 2501 adults > or = 50 years of age, with oversampling of blacks and Hispanics.

Randomized clinical trials: how will results influence clinical practice in the management of symptomatic and asymptomatic extracranial carotid occlusive disease?

Evaluation of the efficacy of carotid endarterectomy and stenting requires careful consideration of clinical trial methodology as applied to the primary clinical end points of the specific trial. Although publication of observational data including registries is helpful in selecting options for further study, these reports are not considered replacements for the randomized clinical trial. This article reviews methodology and results of registries and randomized clinical trials.

Diagnosis and invasive management of carotid atherosclerotic stenosis.

Carotid atherosclerotic stenosis is a known risk factor for ischemic stroke. Methods for detecting stenosis and revascularization abound. The objective of this review was to summarize the evidence for diagnosing carotid artery stenosis and treating symptomatic or asymptomatic stenosis with endarterectomy or stenting.

Guidelines for screening of extracranial carotid artery disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the multidisciplinary practice guidelines committee of the American Society of Neuroimaging; cosponsored by the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology.

The aim of this new statement is to provide comprehensive and timely evidence-based recommendations on the screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general population and selected subsets of patients. Recommendations are included for high-risk persons in the general population; patients undergoing open heart surgery including coronary artery bypass surgery; patients with peripheral vascular diseases, abdominal aortic aneurysms, and renal artery stenosis; patients after radiotherapy for head and neck malignancies; patients following carotid endarterectomy, or carotid artery stent placement; patients with retinal ischemic syndromes; patients with syncope, dizziness, vertigo or tinnitus; and patients with a family history of vascular diseases and hyperhomocysteinemia. The recommendations are based on prevalence of disease, anticipated benefit, and concurrent guidelines from other professional organizations in selected populations.

Treatment of carotid artery disease: stenting or surgery.

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the only form of cerebral revascularization for which Level 1 evidence of effectiveness has been reported. Recent studies demonstrate the feasibility of carotid artery stenting (CAS) as an alternative to CEA. Its popularity is due to the perceived advantages of a less invasive treatment for carotid occlusive disease.

Carotid stenting: should it replace endarterectomy in higher-risk patients?

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as a useful and potentially less-invasive alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for treatment of extracranial carotid stenoses. It has been suggested that specific patient subgroups, including those with significant medical comorbidities, recurrent stenosis, anatomically inaccessible lesions, and a hostile neck, might benefit from CAS. The purpose of this report is to evaluate whether or not CAS should replace CEA in the treatment of the high-risk patient.

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase regulates microvascular hyperpermeability in vivo.

Nitric oxide (NO) is an important regulator of blood flow, but its role in permeability is still challenged. We tested in vivo the hypotheses that: (a) endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is not essential for regulation of baseline permeability; (b) eNOS is essential for hyperpermeability responses in inflammation; and (c) molecular inhibition of eNOS with caveolin-1 scaffolding domain (AP-Cav) reduces eNOS-regulated hyperpermeability. We used eNOS-deficient (eNOS-/-) mice and their wild-type control as experimental animals, platelet-activating factor (PAF) at 10(-7) m as the test pro-inflammatory agent, and integrated optical intensity (IOI) as an index of microvascular permeability.