Background: To explore cross-sectional and longitudinal differences in general health-related and prostate cancer-specific quality of life (QoL) after robotic-assisted (RARP) and laparoscopic (LRP) radical prostatectomy and to analyze predictive variables for QoL outcomes.
Methods: In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, prostate cancer patients were randomly assigned 3:1 to undergo either RARP or LRP. Patient-reported outcomes were prospectively collected before and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after radical prostatectomy and included QoL as a secondary outcome.
Background: Recently, our LAP-01 trial demonstrated superiority of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) over conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) with respect to continence at 3 mo.
Objective: To compare the continence, potency, and oncological outcomes between RARP and LRP in the 12-mo follow-up.
Design, Setting, And Participants: In this multicentre, randomised, patient-blinded controlled trial, patients referred for radical prostatectomy to four hospitals in Germany were randomly assigned (3:1) to undergo either RARP or LRP.
Objective: Age is known to have an impact on outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, age differences can be investigated from a cross-sectional as well as from a longitudinal perspective. This study combines both perspectives.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The LAP-01 trial was designed to address the lack of high-quality literature comparing robotic-assisted (RARP) and laparoscopic (LRP) radical prostatectomy.
Objective: To compare the functional and oncological outcomes between RARP and LRP at 3 mo of follow-up.
Design, Setting, And Participants: In this multicentre, randomised, patient-blinded controlled trial, patients referred for radical prostatectomy to four hospitals in Germany were randomly assigned (3:1) to undergo either RARP or LRP.
Purpose: To assess whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (wb-MRI) for detection of biochemical recurrence in comparison to Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (Ga-PSMA PET/CT) in prostate cancer (Pca) patients after radical prostatectomy.
Methods: This was a prospective trial including 28 consecutive patients (mean age 65.3 ± 9.
Objectives: To report pre-, postoperative and oncological outcomes in patients treated with spot-specific sLND for patients with exclusive nodal recurrence after PCa primary treatment.
Materials And Methods: With regard to salvage treatment failure (sTF), 46 consecutive patients, undergoing 52 sLND for nodal recurrence detected by PET/CT scan were stratified in 3 groups (group A: post-sLND PSA nadir < 0.01 ng/ml and in follow-up reaching a value > 0.
Background: Data on oncological follow-up after robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) have been reported only scarcely and individual studies have reported an increase in early recurrences and atypical recurrences.
Patients And Methods: Clinical data of 89 patients with RARC were compared to 59 patients with open radical cystectomy (ORC) at a single institution. Two-year cancer-specific (2y-CSS) and 2-year overall survival (2y-OS) related to histopathological tumor stage of RARC patients calculated by Kaplan-Meier method were compared to ORC patients using log-rank test.
Purpose: For multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy the number of biopsy cores obtained is arbitrarily established by urologists. Moreover, a general consensus is lacking on the number of biopsy cores to be obtained from a single magnetic resonance imaging lesion. Therefore, we evaluated the feasibility of obtaining only 1 biopsy core per magnetic resonance imaging lesion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: We systematically analyzed the records of patients with PI-RADS™ (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) 3 lesions, which are called equivocal according to PI-RADS version 2, using prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsies. Systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies served as the reference standard.
Materials And Methods: A total of 120 consecutive patients were retrospectively included in the study.
Purpose: To assess the current regional acceptance, valuation, and clinical role of multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) in prostate cancer diagnostics by patients and physicians.
Materials And Methods: Of 482 distributed standardized questionnaires, 328 patient and 31 physician questionnaires (urological and general practitioners in and around Düsseldorf) were analyzed over a period of 11 months. Questions were asked concerning general knowledge about prostate cancer, current diagnostic procedures, and knowledge about mp-MRI and MRI-guided biopsy.
Purpose: To investigate the physiologic Ga-PSMA distribution and evaluate focal or diffuse radiotracer uptake in nonprostate cancer malignancies and in incidental findings.
Methods: Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans in 55 men performed for prostate cancer (49) or renal cell carcinoma (6) staging were analyzed retrospectively. Two radiologists evaluated the datasets in 2 reading sessions.
Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate transrectal MRI-guided in-bore biopsy in patients who either were biopsy-naive (primary biopsy) or had undergone at least one previous negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (secondary biopsy) with regard to cancer detection rate, tumor localization, and lesion size.
Materials And Methods: In total, 1602 biopsy cores from 297 consecutive patients (mean ± SD, 66.1 ± 7.
Background: A significant proportion of prostate cancers (PCas) are missed by conventional transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-GB). It remains unclear whether the combined approach using targeted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy (FUS-GB) and systematic TRUS-GB is superior to targeted MRI-guided in-bore biopsy (IB-GB) for PCa detection.
Objective: To compare PCa detection between IB-GB alone and FUS-GB + TRUS-GB in patients with at least one negative TRUS-GB and prostate-specific antigen ≥4 ng/ml.
Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare patient comfort between MR-guided in-bore prostate biopsy (IB-GB) and MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy (FUS-GB) with additional systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy within a prospective randomized trial.
Methods: Two hundred and ten consecutive patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IB-GB and prior intrarectal instillation of a 2% lidocaine gel (n = 106) or FUS-GB plus additional systematic 12-core TRUS-guided biopsy and prior application of a periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) with 2% mepivacaine (n = 104). The maximal procedural pain (MPP) on a 0-10 visual analog scale and the operating room time were recorded for each biopsy session.
Purpose: Gleason grading is the strongest predictor of prostate cancer outcome and commonly used to decide for or against the different treatment options. However, Gleason upgrading between systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-GB) and radical prostatectomy (RPE) has frequently been observed. With respect to the high accuracy of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for high-grade cancers and the higher percentage of cancer involvement per biopsy core in targeted MR-guided prostate biopsy (MR-GB), we hypothesized that MR-GB reduces the risk of Gleason upgrading on RPE as compared to the gold standard.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: To assess the surgical and oncological outcome of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compared with open radical cystectomy (ORC).
Patients And Methods: Clinical data of 64 patients undergoing RARC between August 2010 and August 2013 were prospectively documented and retrospectively compared with 79 patients undergoing ORC between August 2008 and August 2013 at a single academic institution. Perioperative results, surgical margins status, and nodal yield after RARC and ORC were compared using Mann-Whitney U test (continuous variables) and chi-square test (categorical variables).
Purpose: This study evaluated the accuracy of MR sequences [T2-, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (T2WI, DWI, and DCE) imaging] at 3T, based on the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) scoring system [Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS)] using MR-guided in-bore prostate biopsies as reference standard.
Methods: In 235 consecutive patients [aged 65.7 ± 7.
We aimed to evaluate the effect of a transition from laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) to robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) on peri-operative and oncological patient outcomes. We present the results of the last 50 LPN (group 1) compared with our first 50 RALPN (group 2). The peri-operative data was evaluated using appropriate comparison tests.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: Magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy is increasingly performed to diagnose prostate cancer. However, there is a lack of well controlled, prospective trials to support this treatment method. We prospectively compared magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore biopsy with standard systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in biopsy naïve men with increased prostate specific antigen.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To assess the feasibility of full diffusional kurtosis tensor imaging (DKI) in prostate MRI in clinical routine. Histopathological correlation was achieved by targeted biopsy.
Materials And Methods: Thirty-one men were prospectively included in the study.
Background/aim: Initial inaccurate staging is a common problem associated with active surveillance (AS) for patients detected by transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-GB). Subsequently, repeated biopsies are necessary to monitor such patients. Thus, in addition to the already established clinicopathological criteria, there is a considerable demand for new, objective decision criteria to more accurately select AS candidates.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: The evaluation of lesions detected in prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with increased signal intensity (SI) on high b-value diffusion-weighted images as a sign of malignancy.
Methods: One hundred and three consecutive patients with prostate MRI examination and MRI-guided in-bore biopsy were retrospectively included in the study. MRI-guided in-bore biopsy histologically confirmed prostate cancer in 50 patients (n = 92 lesions).
Background: To estimate potential malignant lesions within the prostate gland, the usage of a scoring system has recently been proposed by a European consensus meeting.
Purpose: To prospectively investigate a scoring system for functional prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using in-bore MR-guided prostate biopsy at 3-T.
Material And Methods: Prostate MRI examinations of 59 patients (between February 2011 and May 2012) with no known prostate cancer, elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, and unsuspicious digital rectal examination were included in the study.
Background/aim: Patients with previous negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-GB) and persistently increased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value represent a great diagnostic problem. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy demonstrates high prostate cancer detection rates in these patients if functional MRI is suspicious for prostate cancer. However, MRI-guided biopsy is not commonly available and features considerable technical requirements.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF