Efficacy of a web-based intervention to improve and sustain knowledge and screening for amblyopia in primary care settings.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of a physician-targeted website to improve knowledge and self-reported behavior relevant to strabismus and amblyopia ("vision") in primary care settings.

Methods: Eligible providers (filing Medicaid claims for at least eight well-child checks at ages 3 or 4 years, 1 year before study enrollment), randomly assigned to control (chlamydia and blood pressure) or vision groups, accessed four web-based educational modules, programmed to present interactive case vignettes with embedded questions and feedback. Each correct response, assigned a value of +1 to a maximum of +7, was used to calculate a summary score per provider.

Design of a randomized clinical trial to improve rates of amblyopia detection in preschool aged children in primary care settings.

Purpose: To present the design of a cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) to evaluate the effectiveness of a web-based intervention for improving provider knowledge about strabismus and amblyopia (S/A) and preschool vision screening (PVS), increase PVS rates, and improve rates of S/A diagnoses made by eye specialists. This is the first cRCT targeting amblyopia prevention.

Methods: Participants were Medicaid providers in AL, SC, or IL who had Internet access and had filed at least 8 claims for well child visits (WCV) for children ages 3 or 4 years old during a 12-month period before enrollment.

Quantitative pediatric vision screening in primary care settings in Alabama.

Purpose: Alabama Medicaid reimburses "objective" vision screening (VS), i.e., by acuity or similar quantitative method, and well child checks (WCCs) separately.

Improving depression care for ethnic and racial minorities: a concept for an intervention that integrates CME planning with improvement strategies.

Depression is one of the most common reasons that individuals seek treatment in the primary care setting. Research in the past 15 years has shown that dramatic improvement in the management of patients with depression is possible. Advances in pharmacotherapy and delivery of depression care have been reported, but few currently benefit members of ethnic and racial minorities.

Addressing disparities in diagnosing and treating depression: a promising role for continuing medical education.

Depression is a very common reason that individuals seek treatment in the primary care setting. However, advances in depression management are often not integrated into care for ethnic and racial minorities. This supplement summarizes evidence in six key areas--current practices in diagnosis and treatment, disparities, treatment in managed care settings, quality improvement, physician learning, and community-based participatory research--used to develop an intervention concept described in the concluding article.

How quality improvement interventions can address disparities in depression.

The quality of depression care, especially care received by minorities, needs improvement. Several interventions have been developed for the purpose of improving the quality of depression management in primary care, including quality improvement strategies employing disease management approaches, the chronic care model, and the Breakthrough Collaborative Series developed by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. This article reviews these interventions and examines their potential to contribute to the improvement of depression care.

Perspectives on disparities in depression care.

Depression is a major public health problem and a leading cause of disability worldwide. Compounding the high rates of morbidity and mortality and treatment challenges associated with depression are the tremendous disparities in quality of mental health care that exist between the majority of the population and those of racial and ethnic minorities. Although more study data are available on depression care for African Americans than for other groups, racial and ethnic minorities overall are less likely than whites to receive an accurate diagnosis, to receive care according to evidence-based guidelines, and to receive an antidepressant upon diagnosis.

Standardizing evaluation of on-line continuing medical education: physician knowledge, attitudes, and reflection on practice.

Introduction: Physicians increasingly earn continuing medical education (CME) credits through on-line courses, but there have been few rigorous evaluations to determine their effects. The present study explores the feasibility of implementing standardized evaluation templates and tests them to evaluate 30 on-line CME courses.

Methods: A time series design was used to compare the knowledge, attitudes, and reported changes in practice of physician participants who completed any of 30 on-line CME courses that were hosted on an academic CME Web site and a CME Web portal during the period from August 1, 2002, through March 31, 2003.

Physicians' Internet information-seeking behaviors.

Introduction: Our understanding about the role of the Internet as a resource for physicians has improved in the past several years with reports of patterns for use and measures of impact on medical practice. The purpose of this study was to begin to shape a theory base for more fully describing physicians' information-seeking behaviors as they apply to Internet use and applications for continuing education providers to more effectively support learning.

Methods: A survey about Internet use and physician information seeking was administered by facsimile transmission to a random sample of 3,347 physicians.