Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
November 2010
Purpose: To study bone healing at implant sites in simulated extraction sockets with 1-mm marginal defects and compare healing around a turned surface (T) to that around a porous oxide surface prepared by anodic oxidation (AO) with or without the use of an autogenous bone graft.
Materials And Methods: All mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted from 10 mongrel dogs. After 9 weeks, four sites were prepared on both sides of all mandibles.
Background: Placement of endosseous dental implants in edentulous areas of the anterior maxilla poses a unique challenge due to variations in the amount of residual alveolar bone. Implant position becomes crucial in cases demanding high esthetic results but possessing minimal ridge width or in cases requiring augmentation. Recent advances in spiral tomography have allowed for more precise planning and placement of endosseous implants in these challenging areas.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To evaluate the bone contact percentage around a proprietary high-temperature dual-etched (DE) implant surface (Osseotite) versus implants with machined, hydroxyapatite (HA), and titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) surfaces.
Materials And Methods: Each implant type was placed in rabbit tibiae of the same animal and assessed at 1 to 8 weeks. Histologic sections were prepared and analyzed histomorphometrically.