Effect of video-based trauma-informed care training for psychiatric nurses: A nonrandomized controlled trial.

Aim: To examine the effect of short-time video-based trauma-informed care (TIC) training in improving attitudes related to TIC and mental health among psychiatric nurses.

Methods: A nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a 60-min TIC training video. The primary outcome measure was the Attitudes Related to Trauma-Informed Care Scale 35 (ARTIC-35).

Research note reliability and validity of Japanese version of the trauma-informed care provider survey (TIC provider survey).

Objective: Robust instruments to evaluate the ability of trauma-informed care among healthcare workers need to be developed, as this would help the implementation of trauma-informed care to prevent re-traumatization of patients. This study aims to assess the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) Provider Survey. A total of 794 healthcare workers were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire, including the TIC Provider Survey, and six measures that were considered to be correlated with it.

Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Attitudes Related to Trauma-Informed Care (ARTIC-10) Scale.

Background: Trauma-informed care is recommended to avoid the inadvertent retraumatization of patients by health care providers. Psychometric evaluation of trauma-informed care instruments is needed. The Japanese version of the Attitudes Related to Trauma-Informed Care (ARTIC-10) Scale has not yet been psychometrically validated.

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery in community mental health service users in Japan.

Background: Supporting personal recovery in people with mental health difficulties is central to mental health services. This study aimed to develop the Japanese version of INSPIRE and Brief INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery and to evaluate its reliability and validity.

Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted from October to December 2015.

Correction to: The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing.

After publication of our article [1] we were notified that the 5-point Likert-type scale in Additional file 1 needs to change from "1 to 5" to "0 to 4". The updated Additional file 1 is included in this correction.

The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing.

Background: Personal recovery is increasingly recognised as an important outcome measure in mental health services. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-J) and test its validity and reliability.

Methods: The study comprised two stages that employed the cross-sectional and prospective cohort designs, respectively.