Publications by authors named "Riman Nasher"

To validate the capability of the dual wavelength laser (Er,Cr:YSGG and diode 940 nm) and the XP-Endoshaper and finisher in removing the smear layer from curved canals. Forty curved root canals were prepared using the R25 file of the Reciproc system. The teeth were randomly divided into five groups: G1: negative control irrigated with distilled water, G2: positive control irrigated with EDTA 17% and a final rinse of NaOCl 3%, G3: XP-Endoshaper and finisher with EDTA 17%, G4: dual wavelength Er,Cr:YSGG (1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The purpose of this literature review was to evaluate the effectiveness of using Er:YAG (erbium-doped yttrium/aluminum/garnet) laser or Er,Cr:YSGG (erbium, chromium-doped yttrium/scandium/gallium/garnet) laser on calculus removal and their effect on the topography and roughness of root surface in comparison with the conventional instruments in the nonsurgical periodontal therapy. One of the most challenging problems in treatment of periodontal disease is the elimination of plaque and calculus, leaving a clean and smooth root surface to decrease plaque and calculus retention, and for good gingival reattachment. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for available literature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study evaluated the degree of endodontic smear layer removal using the Er:YAG PIPS technique (2.94 μm) in comparison with different irrigants. Sixty-four single-rooted teeth were endodontically prepared up to size #40 and were divided into 8 groups (a-h) (n = 8).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the conventional trephine bur and the Erbium,chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser in removing implants in terms of the volume of removed bone, duration of the procedure, and morphological changes on the bone surface.

Materials And Methods: Three human mandibles were utilized, and four implants were inserted in each mandible using a drilling handpiece and burs. The implants were divided into two groups (n = 6) in which two implants from each mandible were removed using a trephine bur running at 1200 rounds per minute (rpm) with water irrigation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF