Publications by authors named "Riedijk S"

Following the discovery of the CRISPR-Cas technology in 2012, there has been a growing global call for public engagement regarding the potential use of human germline gene editing (HGGE). In this systematic scoping review, we aim to evaluate public engagement studies considering the following questions based on three points of attention: 1) Inclusion of underrepresented groups: who have been engaged? 2) Gathering values: what output has been reported? 3) Reaching societal impact: what objectives of public engagement have been reported? A systematic literature search from 2012 to 2023 identified 3464 articles reporting on public engagement studies regarding HGGE retrieved from 12 databases. After screening, 52 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, resulting in 36 articles that cover 31 public engagement studies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Given the potentially large ethical and societal implications of human germline gene editing (HGGE) the urgent need for public and stakeholder engagement (PSE) has been repeatedly expressed. However, the explicit goals of such PSE efforts often remain poorly defined. In this program report, we outline the goals of our Dutch project called De DNA dialogen (The DNA dialogues).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • There are big ethical and social issues with changing human genes, so it's really important to involve everyone in discussions about it.
  • This text suggests using "what if" questions to help imagine different future scenarios instead of jumping straight to "should we do this?" or "how do we do this?"
  • By thinking about various futures, we can better understand what people care about and make sure everyone’s opinions are included in the conversation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study in the Netherlands looked at how talking to people about Human Germline Genome Editing (HGGE) changed their opinions on it.* -
  • Most people agreed that HGGE should be used to stop serious genetic diseases, but not as much for other purposes like fighting infections or making people "better."* -
  • Talking about HGGE didn't really change most people's views, but it helped some understand it better and consider other opinions.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A survey-based discrete-choice experiment was conducted to identify the key features that influence women’s preferences for prenatal genomic testing across different countries.
  • The study involved 1239 women from eight countries who evaluated twelve scenarios comparing invasive tests and found that the most important factors included diagnostic yield, turnaround time, and handling of uncertain results.
  • Results showed significant country-specific variations in preferences, emphasizing that while women generally want detailed information from tests, a uniform approach to managing uncertain results may not be feasible globally.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prenatal DNA tests, such as chromosomal microarray analysis or exome sequencing, increase the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis when fetal structural anomalies are identified. However, some parents will receive uncertain results such as variants of uncertain significance and secondary findings. We aimed to develop a set of attributes and associated levels for a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) that will examine parents' preferences for tests that may reveal uncertain test results.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A group in the Netherlands wanted to understand what people think about a science topic called human germline genome editing (HGGE), which is about changing genes in babies before they're born.
  • They organized discussions from October 2019 to October 2020 with different people to hear their opinions and thoughts.
  • Most people thought HGGE could be okay if it prevents serious diseases, but some felt it's wrong because it goes against natural, ethical, or religious beliefs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Even if the predominant model of science communication with the public is now based on dialogue, many experts still adhere to the outdated deficit model of informing the public.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Exome sequencing (ES) enhanced the diagnostic yield of genetic testing, but has also increased the possibility of uncertain findings. Prenatal ES is increasingly being offered after a fetal abnormality is detected through ultrasound. It is important to know how to handle uncertainty in this particularly stressful period.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To conduct qualitative interviews with healthcare providers working in different countries to understand their experiences of dealing with uncertain results from prenatal chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) and exome sequencing (ES).

Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 31 healthcare providers who report or return prenatal CMA and/or ES results (clinicians, genetic counsellors and clinical scientists) in six countries with differing healthcare systems; Australia (4), Denmark (5), Netherlands (6), Singapore (4), Sweden (6) and United Kingdom (6). The topic guide explored the main sources of uncertainty and their management.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Genomics professionals and the general public have a responsibility to bridge the gap between science and society. The general public has a responsibility to deliberate, as their choices not only impact themselves but also shape society. Conversely, genomics professionals have a responsibility to enable the process of opinion formation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The introduction of the accurate and procedurally easy non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) raises ethical concerns that public attitudes towards prenatal screening may change, leading to societal pressure to participate in aneuploidy screening. This study examined Dutch citizens' attitudes towards a pregnant woman's decision to (1) decline NIPT in the context of two different funding policies and (2) to terminate or continue a pregnancy affected by different disorders. The attitudes of 1096 respondents were assessed with the contrastive vignette method, using two pairs of vignettes about declining NIPT and termination of pregnancy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

For a number of prospective parents, uncertainty during pregnancy starts when an anomaly is found during a routine fetal anomaly scan. This may be followed by numerous tests to determine the etiology and nature of the anomaly. In this study, we aimed to understand how prospective parents perceive and manage uncertainty after being confronted with a structural anomaly during their routine ultrasound.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: A common concern regarding the introduction of chromosomal microarray in prenatal testing is the concomitant identification of an uncertain copy number variant (CNV) where significance and clinical implication for the unborn child can be difficult or impossible to predict. Following the identification of an uncertain CNV, prospective parents may decide to continue the pregnancy. The aim of this study was to explore how prospective parents manage uncertainty and experience pregnancy in light of an uncertain CNV result.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study evaluates how two newer technologies—genomic microarray and noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT)—have changed prenatal cytogenetic testing by increasing diagnostic outcomes while decreasing invasive procedures from 2009 to 2018.
  • - Analysis of 8,608 pregnancies revealed that while NIPT improved detection rates of common aneuploidies, it resulted in fewer invasive tests and a decline in the detection of less common chromosomal alterations.
  • - The authors recommend developing a noninvasive test with a resolution similar to microarrays to better identify microdeletions/microduplications, addressing the interest in broader prenatal diagnostics among expectant mothers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) as the first trimester prenatal screening (FTS) for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 is offered to all pregnant women in the Netherlands. NIPT using genome sequencing allows for an expansion of the scope of FTS and the introduction of NIPT gives rise to ethical and societal concerns about deliberated decision-making, pressure to engage in screening, and possible lack of equal access due to the financial contribution (€175) to NIPT. We explored the opinions and experiences of pregnant women, who were offered FTS, about these concerns, and the possibility of a broadened scope.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Testing options for pregnant women at increased risk of common aneuploidies are non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and invasive prenatal diagnosis (PND). Clinicians are challenged to comprehensively discuss the complex information in a patient-centered and non-directive manner, to allow for patients' informed decision-making. This study explored the information-centeredness, patient-centeredness, and level of non-directivity of different clinicians and examined group differences between their patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Developments in prenatal testing allow the detection of more findings. SNP arrays in prenatal diagnosis (PND) can be analyzed at 0.5 Mb resolution detecting more clinically relevant anomalies, or at 5 Mb resolution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Whole genome array testing not only provides an increased diagnostic yield of pathogenic causative findings, but it may also reveal so called susceptibility loci (SL) for neurodevelopmental disorders. The goal of this study was to evaluate the pregnancy outcomes in SL cases and to establish a protocol for pregnancy management, follow-up and additional investigations.

Methods: Fifty seven cases were evaluated: 34 with and 23 without ultrasound anomalies at referral.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether unexpected diagnoses (UD) made by prenatal array testing contribute to pregnancy management.

Patients & Methods: In 2010-2015 in 19/4043 (0.5%) pregnancies an UD was made.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Genomic microarray may detect susceptibility loci (SL) for neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism and epilepsy, with a yet unquantifiable risk for the fetus. The prenatal disclosure of susceptibility loci is a topic of much debate. Many health care professionals fear that reporting susceptibility loci may put a psychological burden on pregnant couples.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF