Use of a covered stent after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) was compared to PTA alone for treatment of upper extremity hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenoses. Patients with AVF stenosis of 50% or more and evidence of AVF dysfunction underwent treatment with PTA followed by randomization of 142 patients to include a covered stent or 138 patients with PTA alone. Primary outcomes were 30-day safety, powered for noninferiority, and six-month target lesion primary patency (TLPP), powered to test whether TLPP after covered-stent placement was superior to PTA alone.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCardiovasc Intervent Radiol
January 2023
Purpose: To assess occlusion success and adverse events associated with the use of a self-expanding device for peripheral artery embolization.
Methods: This prospective, single-arm, feasibility study was conducted using the Caterpillar™ Arterial Embolization Device composed of opposing nitinol fibers and a flow-occluding membrane. Twenty patients (24 embolization sites) were treated at four investigational centers in New Zealand and Australia and followed for 30 days.
Purpose: To study the use of the self-expanding Covera covered stent for the treatment of stenotic lesions at the venous anastomosis of hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts (AVGs).
Materials And Methods: A total of 110 patients with AVG venous anastomotic stenosis of ≥50% and access dysfunction were treated at 14 centers in the United States using percutaneous transluminal angioplasty followed by covered stent placement. The primary end points were 30-day safety and 6-month target lesion primary patency (TLPP).
Purpose: To assess safety and patency of the Venovo venous stent for the treatment of iliofemoral vein obstruction.
Materials And Methods: Twenty-two international centers enrolled 170 patients in the VERNACULAR study (93 post-thrombotic syndrome; 77 non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions). Primary outcome measures were major adverse events at 30 days and 12-month primary patency (freedom from target vessel revascularization, thrombotic occlusion, or stenosis > 50%).
Objectives: We hypothesized that a drug-coated balloon (DCB) could improve treatment efficacy while maintaining safety when compared with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the treatment of atherosclerotic infrapopliteal arterial lesions.
Methods: A total of 442 patients with angiographically significant lesions were randomized (2:1) to DCB or PTA. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were freedom from major adverse limb events and perioperative death (MALE-POD) at 30 days, and freedom from vessel occlusion, clinically driven target-lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), and above-ankle amputation measured at 6 months.
Purpose: This study sought to assess the performance of the LIFESTREAM balloon-expandable covered stent for the treatment of iliac artery atherosclerotic lesions.
Methods: A total of 155 patients were treated in a prospective, single-arm study at 17 centers in the United States, Europe, and New Zealand. The primary endpoint was a composite of device- or procedure-related death or myocardial infarction (MI) over the course of 30 days, or target lesion revascularization (TLR), major amputation of the target limb, or re-stenosis through 9-months.
: To assess the use of a nitinol stent to treat symptomatic stenoses or occlusions of the native superficial femoral artery (SFA). : Seventy-four patients were treated at 12 Japanese sites. The primary endpoint, freedom from target-limb failure (TLF), was a composite of device- or procedure-related death, target-limb amputation, target-vessel revascularization (TVR), or restenosis compared to an objective performance goal (OPG) at 12 months.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To assess safety and effectiveness of a nitinol retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter in patients who require caval interruption to protect against pulmonary embolism (PE).
Materials And Methods: Two hundred patients with temporary indications for an IVC filter were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter clinical study. Patients undergoing filter implantation were to be followed for 2 years or for 30 days after filter retrieval.