Background: Based principally on findings in three studies, the Collaborative Reanalysis (CR), the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), and the Million Women Study, it is claimed that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is an established cause of breast cancer. The authors have previously reviewed those studies (Parts 1-4). The WHI findings were first published in 2002, following which the use of HRT rapidly declined.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Based principally on findings in three studies, the collaborative reanalysis (CR), the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and the Million Women Study (MWS), it is claimed that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with estrogen plus progestogen (E+P) is now an established cause of breast cancer; the CR and MWS investigators claim that unopposed estrogen therapy (ET) also increases the risk, but to a lesser degree than does E+P. The authors have previously reviewed the findings in the CR and WHI (Parts 1-3).
Objective: To evaluate the evidence for causality in the MWS.
Background: Based principally on findings in three studies, the Collaborative Reanalysis (CR), the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), and the Million Women Study (MWS), it is claimed that combined hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with estrogen plus progestogen is now an established cause of breast cancer. For unopposed estrogen therapy the evidence in the three studies is conflicting: the CR and MWS have reported increased risks in estrogen users, while the WHI has not. The authors have previously reviewed the findings in the CR (Part 1).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Studies from the Women's Health Initiative have reported an increased risk of breast cancer in users of estrogen plus progestogen. Among users of estrogen alone an increased risk was not observed.
Objective: To evaluate the evidence for unopposed estrogen.
BACKGROUND Concern that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) may cause breast cancer has existed since the time it was introduced, and based on evidence in three studies, the Collaborative Reanalysis (CR), the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and the Million Women Study (MWS), it is claimed that causality is now established. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the evidence for causality in the three studies. Methods Using generally accepted causal criteria, in this paper the authors begin with an evaluation of the CR.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To evaluate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with the use of cyproterone acetate (CPA) amongst men with prostate cancer.
Patients And Methods: Using data from the General Practice Research Database, cases of VTE were identified amongst men with prostate cancer. Four controls with no evidence of a VTE were selected for each case.
Purpose: To determine the age- and sex-specific incidence rates of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the population of the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) between 1.1.1992 and 31.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMany animal studies and studies on intermediate clinical endpoints have shown hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to be associated with both favourable and unfavourable cardiovascular effects. We reviewed the literature regarding HRT and the distinct endpoint of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in peri- and postmenopausal women. Searches of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were conducted.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: Case series and spontaneous reports of endometrial cancer have raised the question as to whether the use of tibolone (introduced into the UK in 1991) is associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer. This study set out to evaluate whether tibolone use is associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer.
Methods: Age-adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of endometrial cancer were calculated for tibolone use compared with the use of other hormone replacement therapy (HRT).
Objective: To describe the incidence, prevalence and management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia, reported in UK general practice.
Patients And Methods: All clinical information relating to LUTS and its treatment was assessed for men aged > or = 45 years and registered on the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD) at some time between 1992 and 2001. Incidence and prevalence were derived from the GPRD population.
Purpose: To compare the risk of liver injury in men treated with alpha1-blockers against that in a similar non-exposed population.
Methods: Using a study population registered on the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD) we performed (a) a retrospective cohort analysis amongst men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) indicative of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) comparing the incidence of liver injury in men exposed to alpha1-blockers with the incidence in those not exposed, and (b) two nested case-control studies looking at risk factors associated with the development of liver injury compared with age- or practice-matched controls.
Results: Amongst 45,851 men with LUTS/BPH, 9666 were exposed to an alpha1-blocker and 154 were identified with drug-induced/idiopathic liver injury.
Background And Purpose: Estimates of the incidence of ischemic stroke in young women vary widely from 0.9 to 8.9 per 100,000 per year.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf
December 2002
Purpose: Regulatory authorities have raised concern that alpha 1-blockers, prescribed predominantly for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), may be associated with an increased risk of depression. The aim was to assess the risk of depression with alpha 1-blockers independently of that associated with symptoms being treated and concurrent illness.
Methods: Using a study population registered on the UK General Practice Research Database, and taking a prescription for an antidepressant as a proxy for clinical depression, we performed: (a) cohort analyses comparing the incidence of depression in current users of alpha 1-blockers versus non-users, and in men with BPH versus those without.