Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of single-dose bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% preservative-free (PF) ophthalmic solution with bimatoprost 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground/aim: To evaluate efficacy and safety of bimatoprost 0.03% preservative-free (PF) ophthalmic solution versus bimatoprost 0.03% (Lumigan) ophthalmic solution for glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To evaluate Ozurdex (dexamethasone intravitreal implant [DEX implant]; Allergan, Inc, Irvine, CA) 0.7 mg combined with laser photocoagulation compared with laser alone for treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME).
Design: Randomized, controlled, multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group, 12-month trial.
Objective: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of fixed-combination brimonidine 0.2%-timolol 0.5% compared with latanoprost 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: Ketorolac 0.45% is a new formulation of topical ketorolac in which preservative (benzalkonium chloride, BAK) was removed and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) was added to improve tolerability and reduce dosing frequency. This study compared the effects of ketorolac 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: Anti-inflammatory activity of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is mediated by suppression of cyclooxygenase (COX) isoenzymes. This study compared ocular penetration and inflammation suppression of topical ketorolac 0.45% and bromfenac 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 2 doses of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX implant) for treatment of noninfectious intermediate or posterior uveitis.
Methods: In this 26-week trial, eyes with noninfectious intermediate or posterior uveitis were randomized to a single treatment with a 0.7-mg DEX implant (n = 77), 0.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to characterize the bacterial flora of the ocular and periocular surface in cataract surgery patients and to determine the prevalence of methicillin resistance among staphylococcal isolates obtained from health care workers (HCWs) and non-HCWs.
Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, case series study, eyelid and conjunctival cultures were obtained from the nonoperative eye of 399 consecutive cataract patients on the day of surgery prior to application of topical anesthetics, antibiotics, or antiseptics. Speciation and susceptibility testing were performed at the Dean A.
Purpose: To evaluate conjunctival hyperemia associated with bimatoprost 0.01% treatment in patients who replace latanoprost 0.005% with bimatoprost 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of twice-daily, preservative-free ketorolac 0.45% (Acuvail; Allergan, Inc, Irvine, California, USA) administration for treatment of inflammation and pain after cataract surgery.
Design: Prospective, randomized trial.
Purpose: To evaluate control of intraocular pressure (IOP) and IOP fluctuation in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma treated with fixed-combination brimonidine-timolol compared with brimonidine or timolol monotherapy.
Design: Post hoc analysis of data from 2 identical, 12-month, randomized, double-masked, multicenter trials.
Methods: Patients were treated bilaterally with fixed brimonidine-timolol twice a day (n = 385), brimonidine tartrate 0.
Purpose: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of ophthalmic formulations of bimatoprost 0.01% and 0.0125% compared with bimatoprost 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of 0.2% brimonidine tartrate and 0.5% timolol maleate (fixed brimonidine-timolol) compared with the component medications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground And Objective: Because patients with diabetes mellitus may visit their primary care physician regularly but not their ophthalmologist, a retinal risk assessment in the primary care setting could improve the screening rate for diabetic retinopathy. An imaging system for use in the primary care setting to identify diabetic retinopathy requiring referral to an ophthalmologist was evaluated.
Patients And Methods: In a masked prospective study, images were obtained from 11 patients with diabetes mellitus using both the digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography.
Background: Epinastine hydrochloride is a nonsedating antihistamine with a high affinity for histamine H(1) receptors, together with mast cell-stabilizing and anti-inflammatory activities.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of topically administered ophthalmic epinastine using the conjunctival antigen challenge (CAC) model in patients with a history of allergic conjunctivitis.
Methods: This prospective, single-center, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, Phase III clinical trial was conducted at the Ophthalmic Research Associates study center (North Andover, Massachusetts) from November 2000 to January 2001.
Background: Epinastine hydrochloride is an antihistamine with mast cell-stabilizing and anti-inflammatory activity.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of ophthalmic epinastine in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) exposed to environmental allergens.
Methods: This randomized (age-stratified), double-masked, parallel-group, active- and vehicle-controlled, environmental, Phase III clinical trial was conducted at 6 ophthalmology clinics in the United States.
Purpose: Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is presumed to be less prevalent in the African American population. The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics of CSCR in African Americans and Caucasians.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed.
Purpose: To design and validate a survey instrument that measures vision-related functional status, which is appropriate for self-administration in a clinical practice and mail survey setting.
Design: Observational, validation study in sequential patients.
Methods: A prototype visual function instrument (the Cataract TyPE Spec) was developed based on focus group input and then validated in an outcomes study conducted among 1,823 patients who underwent cataract extraction performed by 22 surgeons at six centers in the United States.
Purpose: To determine utilities (patient preferences) for dry eye disease.
Design: Survey study.
Participants: Fifty-six patients with mild, moderate, or severe dry eye treated by ophthalmologists in the Eye Care Services department of Henry Ford Health Care System.