This article describes our approach and evidence-based evaluation of popliteal entrapment syndrome. Included is a technical description of our use of preoperative intravascular ultrasound for diagnosis and operative planning in combination with our utilization of intraoperative duplex ultrasound. This evidence-based, methodical approach enables not only the correct diagnosis of the type of popliteal entrapment, but more importantly, identifies irreparable injury to the popliteal artery that would necessitate operative arterial reconstruction prior to surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSuperficialization of arteriovenous fistulae allows for improved dialysis access allowing for prolonged utilization and more efficient dialysis treatment. Multiple methods are described for superficializing arteriovenous fistulae, and minimizing the surgical intervention is advantageous for patient recovery and potentially improved outcomes. We describe a novel technique of superficialization of an upper extremity arteriovenous fistula employing ultrasound-guided liposuction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe battlefield has provided a multitude of advancements in the management of hemorrhage and vascular repair. Basic understanding of the anatomy and exposures of lower extremity injuries is essential to any surgeon caring for these patients. The techniques of repair and potential adjunctive measures (eg, shunts) available should always be considered when approaching a vascular injury.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFunctional popliteal entrapment syndrome (FPES) was first described by Rignault and colleagues in 1985 (Int. Angiol. 1985;4:341-343).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The use of prosthetic grafts for reconstruction of military vascular trauma has been consistently discouraged. In the current conflict, however, the signature wound involves multiple extremities with significant loss of soft tissue and potential autogenous venous conduits. We reviewed the experience with the use of prosthetic grafts for the treatment of vascular injuries sustained during recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The management of venous trauma remains controversial. Critics of venous repair have cited an increased incidence of associated venous thromboembolic events with this management. We analyzed the current treatment of wartime venous injuries in United States military personnel in an effort to answer this question.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVasc Endovascular Surg
September 2007
Recent combat casualties have stimulated a reassessment of the principles of management of high-risk extremity injuries with a normal vascular examination. Rapid evacuations have presented numerous U.S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPerspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther
June 2006
The management of venous trauma continues to be debated. Historically, ligation of injured veins is the most common modality of surgical treatment. In the past half-century, additional techniques have been used, including primary repair, interposition graft, and occasionally endovascular techniques.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTraumatic hemorrhage and vascular injury management have been concerns for both civilian and military physicians. During the 20th century, advances in technique allowed surgeons to focus on vascular repair, restoration of perfusion, limb salvage, and life preservation. Military surgeons such as Makins, DeBakey, Hughes, Rich, and others made significant contributions to the field of surgery in general and vascular surgery in particular.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF