Publications by authors named "Raftopoulos S"

Background And Aims: The efficacy of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is limited by recurrence and the necessity for conservative surveillance. Margin thermal ablation (MTA) after EMR has reduced the incidence of recurrence at the first surveillance colonoscopy at 6 months (SC1). Whether this effect is durable to second surveillance colonoscopy (SC2) is unknown.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is being considered for treating large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) to manage potential low-risk cancers, but its effectiveness in the right colon is unclear.
  • A study analyzed over 3,000 cases, finding that only 2.6% of patients who underwent endoscopic resection (ER) had cancers, with just 0.78% being classified as low-risk.
  • The results suggest that a universal ESD approach for right colon LNPCPs may not significantly improve patient outcomes due to the low prevalence of treatable low-risk cancers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aim: Snare resection of nonlifting colonic lesions often requires supplemental techniques. We compared the success rates of neoplasia eradication using hot avulsion and argon plasma coagulation in colonic polyps when complete snare polypectomy had failed.

Methods: Polyps that were not completely resectable by snare polypectomy were randomized to argon plasma coagulation or hot avulsion for completion of resection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders (NAEMDs), encompassing distal esophageal spasm (DES) and hypercontractile esophagus (HCE), are rare conditions. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a promising treatment option. In NAEMDs, unlike with achalasia, the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) functions normally, suggesting the potential of LES preservation during POEM.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background & Aims: Large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) may have synchronous LNPCPs in up to 18% of cases. The nature of this relationship has not been investigated. We aimed to examine the relationship between individual LNPCP characteristics and synchronous colonic LNPCPs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

BACKGROUND : Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is the standard of care for the resection of small (< 10 mm) colonic polyps. Limited data exist for its efficacy for medium-sized (10-19 mm) nonpedunculated polyps, especially conventional adenomas. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of CSP/cold endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR) for medium-sized nonpedunculated colonic polyps.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Management of covert submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC) discovered after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (pEMR) of large (>20 mm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps is challenging. The residual cancer risk is largely unknown. We sought to evaluate this in a large tertiary referral cohort.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: The reported progression rate from low-grade dysplasia (LGD) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) ranges from .4% to 13.4% per year.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background & Aims: Thermal ablation of the defect margin after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-T) for treating large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) has shown efficacy in a randomized trial, with a 4-fold reduction, in residual or recurrent adenoma (RRA) at first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1). The clinical effectiveness of this treatment, in the real world, remains unknown.

Methods: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of EMR-T in an international multicenter prospective trial (NCT02957058).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To describe the clinical and procedural outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia in Australia.

Design, Setting: Prospective observational study in three Australian tertiary referral centres, 5 May 2014 - 27 October 2019 (66 months).

Participants: Patients who had undergone POEM for achalasia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background & Aims: Although perforation is the most feared adverse event associated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), limited data exists concerning its management. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of intra-procedural deep mural injury (DMI) in an international multi-center observational cohort of large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs).

Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent EMR for a LNPCP ≥20 mm were evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Modern management of Barrett's oesophagus and related neoplasia essentially focuses upon surveillance to detect early low-risk neoplastic lesions and offering organ-preserving advanced endoscopic therapies, while traditional surgical treatments of oesophagectomy and lymph node clearance with or without chemoradiation are preserved only for high-risk and advanced carcinomas. With this evolution towards figless invasive therapy, the choice of therapy hinges upon the pathological assessment for risk stratifying patients into those with low risk for nodal metastasis who can continue with less invasive endoscopic therapies and others with high risk for nodal metastasis for which surgery or other forms of treatment are indicated. Detection and confirmation of neoplasia in the first instance depends upon endoscopic and pathological assessment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Barrett oesophagus is a known precursor of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Early EAC includes T1a (invasion into mucosa) and T1b (invasion into submucosa but not muscularis propria). Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) provides accurate histological staging and definitive treatment for early EAC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Multimodal endoscopic treatment for Barrett's esophagus (BE) related high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is safe and effective. However, there is a paucity of data to predict the response to endoscopic treatment. This study aimed to identify predictors of failure to achieve complete eradication of neoplasia (CE-N) and complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: The optimal management strategy for patients with endoscopically resected malignant colorectal polyps (MCP) has yet to be defined. The aim of this study was to validate a published decision-making tool, termed the Scottish Polyp Cancer Study (SPOCS) algorithm, on a large international population.

Methods: The SPOCS algorithm allocates patients to risk groups based on just two variables: the polyp resection margin and the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Study Aims: Endoscopically resected malignant colorectal polyps (MCPs) present a dilemma regarding whether the risk of residual disease justifies a major bowel resection. Overtreatment is common, and the vast majority of patients who undergo resection have no residual tumor. The aim of this study was to investigate whether revising the definition of vertical margin involvement following MCP polypectomy could reduce unnecessary surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Conventional EMR using a hot snare is the standard of care for resection of large (≥20 mm) nonmalignant sessile colonic polyps. Serious adverse events are predominantly because of electrocautery. This could potentially be avoided by cold snare piecemeal EMR (CSP-EMR).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Endoscopic resection (ER) allows optimal staging with potential cure of early-stage luminal malignancies while maintaining organ preservation. ER and surgery are non-competing but complementary therapeutic options. In addition, histological examination of ER specimens can either confirm or refine the pre-procedure diagnosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Residual or recurrent adenoma is a key challenge for treating large colonic laterally spreading lesions, with en bloc EMR showing promise for lower recurrence rates compared to piecemeal EMR.
  • A study analyzed outcomes for size-matched lesions resected by either method over ten years, revealing that en bloc EMR had a higher risk of major deep mural injury but lower rates of recurrent adenomas at initial follow-ups.
  • Ultimately, while en bloc EMR might not offer significant advantages for benign lesions, its increased risk of injuries suggests it should be used carefully, especially for lesions suspected to be invasive.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF