Adaptation of the o-DGT for the sampling of 12 hormones: calibration, performance evaluation, and recommendation.

This work highlights the methodology for the development of diffusive gradients in thin films (o-DGT) through its adaptation for 12 natural and synthetic hormones belonging to three different families (estrogens, progestins, and androgens). A reliable strategy must be applied during o-DGT lab adaptation to avoid issues related to the analysis (i.e.

Interest of a new large diffusive gradients in thin films (L-DGT) for organic compounds monitoring: On-field comparison with conventional passive samplers.

In this work, the performances of a Large Diffusive Gradients in Thin films (L-DGT, i.e., a DGT based on a Chemcatcher® holder with a 5-fold larger sampling area) were compared on-field with the conventional DGT and the Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Sampler (POCIS) for the monitoring of a wide range of organic contaminants (i.

Development of a multi-hormone analysis method by LC-MS/MS for environmental water application using diffusive gradient in thin films.

An analysis method for four families of hormones (estrogens, progestins, androgens and prostaglandins), dedicated to an efficient water monitoring with passive sampling, was developed using a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry with triple quadrupole coupling and universal electrospray ionisation. Thirteen natural and synthetic hormones in ultra-pure water could be analysed in a single run according to the French Standard NF T90-210: calibration range of 0.1 (except for 17β-Estradiol, Estriol, Estrone and Diethylstilbestrol, from 0.

Diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT): A suitable tool for metals/metalloids monitoring in continental waterbodies at the large network scale.

The contribution of Diffusive Gradients in Thin films (DGT) passive sampling to continental water quality monitoring was assessed in a real measurement network (6 sampling campaigns, 17 stations). Ten metals/metalloids (Al, Zn, Ni, Cd, Cu, Pb, Cr, As, Se and Sb) were studied using the control laboratory's working conditions with grab and DGT passive sampling. The DGT field deployments were robust, with a 3% sampler loss rate and a <65% average relative deviation between duplicates.