Knockout tales: the versatile roles of histone H3.3 in development and disease.

Histone variant H3.3 plays novel roles in development as compared to canonical H3 proteins and is the most commonly mutated histone protein of any kind in human disease. Here we discuss how gene targeting studies of the two H3.

A knockout-first model of H3f3a gene targeting leads to developmental lethality.

Histone variant H3.3 is encoded by two genes, H3f3a and H3f3b, which can be expressed differentially depending on tissue type. Previous work in our lab has shown that knockout of H3f3b causes some neonatal lethality and infertility in mice, and chromosomal defects in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs).

Histone H3.3 K27M chromatin functions implicate a network of neurodevelopmental factors including ASCL1 and NEUROD1 in DIPG.

Background: The histone variant H3.3 K27M mutation is a defining characteristic of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG)/diffuse midline glioma (DMG). This histone mutation is responsible for major alterations to histone H3 post-translational modification (PTMs) and subsequent aberrant gene expression.

DPPA2, DPPA4, and other DPPA factor epigenomic functions in cell fate and cancer.

Many gene networks are shared between pluripotent stem cells and cancer; a concept exemplified by several DPPA factors such as DPPA2 and DPPA4, which are highly and selectively expressed in stem cells but also found to be reactivated in cancer. Despite their striking expression pattern, for many years the function of DPPA2 and DPPA4 remained a mystery; knockout of Dppa2 and Dppa4 did not affect pluripotency, but caused lung and skeletal defects late in development, long after Dppa2 and Dppa4 expression had been turned off. A number of recent papers have further clarified and defined the roles of these important factors, identifying roles in priming the chromatin and maintaining developmental competency through regulating both H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 at bivalent chromatin domains, and acting to remodel chromatin and facilitate reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotency.

GRHL3 activates FSCN1 to relax cell-cell adhesions between migrating keratinocytes during wound reepithelialization.

The migrating keratinocyte wound front is required for skin wound closure. Despite significant advances in wound healing research, we do not fully understand the molecular mechanisms that orchestrate collective keratinocyte migration. Here, we show that, in the wound front, the epidermal transcription factor Grainyhead like-3 (GRHL3) mediates decreased expression of the adherens junction protein E-cadherin; this results in relaxed adhesions between suprabasal keratinocytes, thus promoting collective cell migration and wound closure.

Stem cell models help crack regional oncohistone codes driving childhood gliomas.

In this issue of Cell Stem Cell, Funato et al. (2021) and Bressan et al. (2021) use stem cells as models to define functions of the histone H3.

Reciprocal H3.3 gene editing identifies K27M and G34R mechanisms in pediatric glioma including NOTCH signaling.

Histone H3.3 mutations are a hallmark of pediatric gliomas, but their core oncogenic mechanisms are not well-defined. To identify major effectors, we used CRISPR-Cas9 to introduce H3.

Genomic functions of developmental pluripotency associated factor 4 (Dppa4) in pluripotent stem cells and cancer.

Developmental pluripotency associated factor 4 (Dppa4) is a highly specific marker of pluripotent cells, and is also overexpressed in certain cancers, but its function in either of these contexts is poorly understood. In this study, we use ChIP-Seq to identify Dppa4 binding genome-wide in three distinct cell types: mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC), embryonal carcinoma cells, and 3T3 fibroblasts ectopically expressing Dppa4. We find a core set of Dppa4 binding sites shared across cell types, and also a substantial number of sites unique to each cell type.

Characterization of enhancers and the role of the transcription factor KLF7 in regulating corneal epithelial differentiation.

During tissue development, transcription factors bind regulatory DNA regions called enhancers, often located at great distances from the genes they regulate, to control gene expression. The enhancer landscape during embryonic stem cell differentiation has been well characterized. By contrast, little is known about the shared and unique enhancer regulatory mechanisms in different ectodermally derived epithelial cells.

GRHL3 binding and enhancers rearrange as epidermal keratinocytes transition between functional states.

Transcription factor binding, chromatin modifications and large scale chromatin re-organization underlie progressive, irreversible cell lineage commitments and differentiation. We know little, however, about chromatin changes as cells enter transient, reversible states such as migration. Here we demonstrate that when human progenitor keratinocytes either differentiate or migrate they form complements of typical enhancers and super-enhancers that are unique for each state.

Cofactors of LIM Domains Associate with Estrogen Receptor α to Regulate the Expression of Noncoding RNA H19 and Corneal Epithelial Progenitor Cell Function.

Cofactors of LIM domain proteins, CLIM1 and CLIM2, are widely expressed transcriptional cofactors that are recruited to gene regulatory regions by DNA-binding proteins, including LIM domain transcription factors. In the cornea, epithelium-specific expression of a dominant negative (DN) CLIM under the keratin 14 (K14) promoter causes blistering, wounding, inflammation, epithelial hyperplasia, and neovascularization followed by epithelial thinning and subsequent epidermal-like differentiation of the corneal epithelium. The defects in corneal epithelial differentiation and cell fate determination suggest that CLIM may regulate corneal progenitor cells and the transition to differentiation.

Dynamic networking for epidermal differentiation.

In this issue of Developmental Cell, Lopez-Pajares et al. (2015) identify regulatory networks that are controlled by the transcriptional regulators MAF:MAFB. These networks play a crucial and previously unrecognized role in epidermal differentiation, functioning both to repress progenitor genes and to activate early and late differentiation genes.

A GRHL3-regulated repair pathway suppresses immune-mediated epidermal hyperplasia.

Dermal infiltration of T cells is an important step in the onset and progression of immune-mediated skin diseases such as psoriasis; however, it is not known whether epidermal factors play a primary role in the development of these diseases. Here, we determined that the prodifferentiation transcription factor grainyhead-like 3 (GRHL3), which is essential during epidermal development, is dispensable for adult skin homeostasis, but required for barrier repair after adult epidermal injury. Consistent with activation of a GRHL3-regulated repair pathway in psoriasis, we found that GRHL3 is upregulated in lesional skin and binds known epidermal differentiation gene targets.

The Ets transcription factor EHF as a regulator of cornea epithelial cell identity.

The cornea is the clear, outermost portion of the eye composed of three layers: an epithelium that provides a protective barrier while allowing transmission of light into the eye, a collagen-rich stroma, and an endothelium monolayer. How cornea development and aging is controlled is poorly understood. Here we characterize the mouse cornea transcriptome from early embryogenesis through aging and compare it with transcriptomes of other epithelial tissues, identifying cornea-enriched genes, pathways, and transcriptional regulators.

GRHL3/GET1 and trithorax group members collaborate to activate the epidermal progenitor differentiation program.

The antagonistic actions of Polycomb and Trithorax are responsible for proper cell fate determination in mammalian tissues. In the epidermis, a self-renewing epithelium, previous work has shown that release from Polycomb repression only partially explains differentiation gene activation. We now show that Trithorax is also a key regulator of epidermal differentiation, not only through activation of genes repressed by Polycomb in progenitor cells, but also through activation of genes independent of regulation by Polycomb.