Publications by authors named "Rabia I Kodapanakkal"
Many apps (e.g., social media, online streaming) include a social component where individual privacy decisions go beyond individual contexts and affect other people.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe study of moral judgements often centres on moral dilemmas in which options consistent with deontological perspectives (that is, emphasizing rules, individual rights and duties) are in conflict with options consistent with utilitarian judgements (that is, following the greater good based on consequences). Greene et al. (2009) showed that psychological and situational factors (for example, the intent of the agent or the presence of physical contact between the agent and the victim) can play an important role in moral dilemma judgements (for example, the trolley problem).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArticle Synopsis
- Moral framing strategies can effectively persuade individuals with strong moralized attitudes, but they may also deepen those moral divides and reduce willingness to compromise.
- In three studies with a total of over 4,700 U.S. participants, moral messages intensified moral attitudes against big-data technologies, while nonmoral messages had the opposite effect.
- Emotional responses, such as anger and disgust, contribute to moralization, while perceptions of financial cost promote de-moralization, suggesting that framing impacts how people view and act on contentious issues.