Publications by authors named "R Veatch"

Article Synopsis
  • Deceased organ donor intervention research focuses on improving the quality and quantity of organs for transplantations, specifically assessing kidney transplant candidates' willingness to accept "intervention organs."
  • A study involving 249 participants revealed that 96% of candidates were open to accepting these types of organs, influenced by factors like low risk to the kidney, younger donor age, longer waiting times for organ offers, and trust in their physician.
  • Interestingly, candidates who had been waitlisted longer or identified as Black were less likely to accept intervention organs, highlighting important disparities that need addressing in future organ intervention trials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In celebration of the fortieth anniversary of the publication of Beauchamp and Childress's Principles of Biomedical Ethics, a review is undertaken to compare the lists of principles in various bioethical theories to determine the extent to which the various lists can be reconciled. Included are the single principle theories of utilitarianism, libertarianism, Hippocratism, and the theories of Pellegrino, Engelhardt, The Belmont Report, Beauchamp and Childress, Ross, Veatch, and Gert. We find theories all offering lists of principles (or the equivalent) numbering from one to ten.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prestigious University is a large, private educational institution with a medical school, a university hospital, a law school, and graduate and undergraduate colleges all on a single campus. In the face of the Covid-19 pandemic, students were told during spring break to return to campus only briefly to retrieve their belongings. Classes then went online.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Disqualifying patients with intellectual disabilities (ID) from transplantation has received growing attention from the media, state legislatures, the Office of Civil Rights, and recently the National Council on Disability, as well as internationally. Compared with evidence-based criteria used to determine transplant eligibility, the ID criterion remains controversial because of its potential to be discriminatory, subjective, and because its relationship to outcomes is uncertain. Use of ID in determining transplant candidacy may stem partly from perceived worse adherence and outcomes for patients with ID, fear of penalties to transplant centers for poor outcomes, and stigma surrounding the quality of life for people with ID.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF