Three different patterns of positive Clostridium difficile laboratory tests. A comparison of clinical behavior.

Clostridium difficile (CD) diagnosis is very varied and under discussion. Different research groups disagree on the clinical significance of patients with negative direct toxin and positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or even more with direct toxin and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) both negatives, but CD detected by toxigenic culture (TC). The objective was to analyze the characteristics of patients with 3 different diagnostic criteria.

Role of Clostridioides difficile in hospital environment and healthcare workers.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) was traditionally considered to be transmitted within healthcare environment, from other patients or healthcare workers (HCW). Recently, this idea has been challenged. Our objective was to determine the extent of C.

Gradient diffusion antibiogram used directly on bronchial aspirates for a rapid diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Background: In patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia, a rapid etiological diagnosis is crucial as incorrect or delayed treatment in the first few hours leads to a worse prognosis and a higher mortality rate. This study examines the efficacy of a rapid antibiogram on bronchial aspirates in patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

Methods: The direct gradient diffusion susceptibility testing method (GDM) on respiratory samples was compared with a standard broth microdilution method (BMD) after quantitative cultures in patients with suspicion of VAP.

Clostridioides difficile contamination in a clinical microbiology laboratory?

Objectives: Clostridioides difficile infection has traditionally been considered to be transmitted predominantly within health-care settings. It is not recognized as a pathogen that presents a risk of laboratory acquisition. Data on laboratory contamination and acquisition by laboratory personnel are lacking.