Publications by authors named "R Murai"
A 51-year-old man with a history of antibiotic therapy for syphilis 1 month ago presented with syncope. Computed tomography revealed circumferential aortic wall thickening complicating severe stenosis of left main coronary ostium. Abnormalities in serologic and cerebrospinal fluid tests led to the diagnosis of syphilitic aortitis and neurosyphilis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLow-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: Insights From the CURRENT AS Registry-2.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
November 2024
Background: Low-gradient (LG) aortic stenosis (AS) has not been fully characterized compared with high-gradient (HG) AS in terms of cardiac damage, frailty, aortic valve calcification, and clinical outcomes.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes between each hemodynamic type of LG AS and HG AS.
Methods: The current study included 3,363 patients in the CURRENT AS (Contemporary outcomes after sURgery and medical tREatmeNT in patients with severe Aortic Stenosis) Registry-2 after excluding patients without indexed stroke volume or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) data.
Background: There is a paucity of data on safety of calcium channel blockers (CCB) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and hypertension.
Methods And Results: Among 2,460 patients with severe AS and hypertension receiving antihypertensive therapy in the CURRENT AS registry-2, we compared the clinical outcomes between patients taking antihypertensive therapy with CCB (CCB group) and without CCB (no CCB group). In the entire study population, CCB was prescribed in 1,763 patients (71.
Background: Heart failure (HF) requires effective management and self-care education to improve outcomes. However, daily self-care routines necessary for managing HF can lead to psychological issues, including stress, potentially exacerbating the condition. Patient stress-coping behaviors may significantly impact prognosis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArticle Synopsis
- * TAVI centers preferred aortic valve replacement (AVR) treatments, with a higher percentage opting for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) compared to non-TAVI centers (71% vs. 23%).
- * Despite the differences in treatment frequency, both types of centers showed similar rates of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalizations over three years, indicating no significant outcome difference.