Publications by authors named "R Micelli Lupinacci"

Objective: Ampullary neoplastic lesions can be resected by endoscopic papillectomy (EP) or transduodenal surgical ampullectomy (TSA) while pancreaticoduodenectomy is reserved for more advanced lesions. We present the largest retrospective comparative study analysing EP and TSA.

Design: Of all patients in the database, lesions with prior interventions, benign histology advanced malignancy (T2 and more), patients with hereditary syndromes and those undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were excluded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The potential oncological benefit of extending the waiting period between neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgical resection for rectal cancer is debated.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of prolonging this waiting period on the 5-year oncological prognosis and 2-year functional result of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma.

Design: Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, controlled trial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases (RPN) from colon cancer (CC) is a therapeutic challenge. Available evidence supporting a curative approach is weak and uncertainties remain concerning the extent of the dissection, the optimal timing for surgery, and the role of adjuvant radiotherapy. We report the outcomes of a curative intent strategy in a recent monocentric series of patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: PDE10A inhibition represents a potential mechanism for treating schizophrenia. PDE10A inhibitors increase cyclic nucleotides in striatal neurons, thereby mimicking the effects of dopamine receptor D2 antagonists and D1 agonists. We evaluated the PDE10A inhibitor MK-8189 for treating schizophrenia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study evaluates three minimally invasive surgical techniques for total mesorectal excision (TME) in treating low/mid locally advanced rectal cancer: laparoscopic, robotic, and transanal TME.
  • An analysis of 468 patients revealed that robotic and transanal TME had lower complication and conversion rates compared to laparoscopic TME, with robotic TME showing fewer anastomotic leaks.
  • The study concludes that robotic and transanal TME approaches can lead to quicker recovery times and fewer postoperative issues compared to laparoscopic TME, indicating their potential advantages for patient outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF