Publications by authors named "R Kiyamova"

We showed previously that inhibition of KIT signaling in GISTs activates FGFR-signaling pathway rendering cancer cells resistant to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (RTKi) imatinib mesylate (IM) (Gleevec) despite of absence of secondary mutations and thereby illustrating a rationale for the combined (e.g., KIT- and FGFR-targeted) therapies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The main goal of this study was to characterize cancer/testis antigens (CTAs) as potential molecular markers of ovarian cancer. First, we gathered and analyzed a significantly large dataset of 21 selected CTAs that are encoded by 32 genes; the dataset consisted of the mutation data, expression data, and survival data of patients with ovarian cancer (n = 15,665). The 19 functionally significant missense mutations were identified in 9 CTA genes: ACRBP, CCT4, KDM5B, MAGEA1, MAGEA4, PIWIL1, PIWIL2, PRAME, and SPA17.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

NaPi2b is a sodium-dependent phosphate transporter that belongs to the SLC34 family of transporters which is mainly responsible for phosphate homeostasis in humans. Although NaPi2b is widely expressed in normal tissues, its overexpression has been demonstrated in ovarian, lung, and other cancers. A valuable set of antibodies, including L2 (20/3) and MX35, and its humanized versions react strongly with an antigen on the surface of ovarian and other carcinoma cells.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The chemoresistance of tumor cells is one of the most urgent challenges in modern oncology and in pancreatic cancer, in which this problem is the most prominent. Therefore, the identification of new chemosensitizing co-targets may be a path toward increasing chemotherapy efficacy. In this work, we performed high-performance in vitro knockout CRISPR/Cas9 screening to find potential regulators of the sensitivity of pancreatic cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The main goal of this study is to consider as a potential prognostic marker of oncological diseases using the mutational, expression, and survival data of cancer studies which are publicly available online. We collected data from four databases (cBioPortal, The Cancer Genome Atlas; cBioPortal, Genie; International Cancer Genome Consortium; ArrayExpress). In total, 111,283 samples were categorized according to 27 tumor locations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF