Attentional inhibition or paracontrast?

In visual search experiments using asynchronous presentation of target and distractors, a robust and unexpected inhibition of reaction time was observed for the discrimination of a temporally trailing target. A number of experiments were required to determine the source of this inhibition. These experiments eliminated the possibilities that the inhibition might be a manifestation of three attentional processes: inhibition of return, attentional dwell time, or attentional capture by the temporally leading item.

Guided search: the effects of learning.

The previous report (Efron & Yund, 1996) offered an interpretation of the results of a number of search experiments within the theoretical context of the guided search model of Cave and Wolfe (1990) and Wolfe (1994). The present report extends this interpretation to the effects of extended practice when subjects search for a target defined by its orientation in the presence of a number of heterogeneous distractor items having differing orientations. Three experiments are described: The first revealed that over the course of 21 experimental sessions extending for a period of 6 weeks there were marked decreases in the magnitude of the reaction time gradient (RTG) and the right visual field superiority observed in the previous experiments.

Spatial nonuniformities in visual search.

Previous search experiments in this laboratory have been concerned with the marked differences in target detectability as a function of its location in the visual field-differences we have called a detectability gradient-when subjects were required to detect a vertically oriented "target" among a number of distractor items having different orientations. This gradient was characterized by a marked right visual field superiority as well as differences in the shape of the gradient in the two half fields. A scanning model was proposed to account for these robust phenomena.

Visual detectability gradients: effect of high-speed visual experience.

The detectability of a target pattern presented briefly with a number of similar nontarget patterns varies as a function of the spatial location of the target. Previous work attributes these detectability gradients to a visual search process--a non-eye movement serial scan--that examines a decaying neural representation of the image. (Heron, 1957; Efron, Yund, & Nichols, 1987, 1990a,b,c; Yund, Efron, & Nichols, 1990a,b,c).