High-resolution genomic profiling of adenomas and carcinomas of the salivary glands reveals amplification, rearrangement, and fusion of HMGA2.

Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (Ca-ex-PA) is an epithelial malignancy developing within a benign salivary gland pleomorphic adenoma (PA). Here we have used genome-wide, high-resolution array-CGH, and fluorescence in situ hybridization to identify genes amplified in double min chromosomes and homogeneously staining regions in PA and Ca-ex-PA and to identify additional genomic imbalances characteristic of these tumor types. Ten of the 16 tumors analyzed showed amplification/gain of a 30-kb minimal common region, consisting of the 5'-part of HMGA2 (encoding the three DNA-binding domains).

High-resolution array CGH analysis of salivary gland tumors reveals fusion and amplification of the FGFR1 and PLAG1 genes in ring chromosomes.

We have previously identified a subgroup of pleomorphic salivary gland adenomas with ring chromosomes of uncertain derivation. Here, we have used spectral karyotyping (SKY), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and high-resolution oligonucleotide array-CGH to determine the origin and content of these rings and to identify genes disrupted as a result of ring formation. Of 16 tumors with rings, 11 were derived from chromosome 8, 3 from chromosome 5 and 1 each from chromosomes 1, 6 and 9.

Cytogenetical observations in a mucoepidermoid carcinoma arising from heterotopic intranodal salivary gland tissue.

The cytogenetical observations in a mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEG) arising from heterotopic intranodal salivary gland tissue are presented. The MEC was characterized by two reciprocal translocations, viz, t(1;7) (p36;q11) and t(11;19) (q14-21;p11). The present and the previous studies show that the last rearrangement or related deviations characterize about 40% of all MEG.

Cytogenetics of parametrial leiomyoma.

The cytogenetical findings from a parametrial leiomyoma are presented. The results, together with those of five previously presented cases, show obvious differences when compared to the chromosomal findings in uterine myomas. Ontogenic factors are proposed to be causative for the cytogenetical differences.