Treatments at ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) have the potential to improve the therapeutic index of radiation therapy (RT) by sparing normal tissues compared to conventional dose rate irradiations. Insufficient and inconsistent reporting in physics and dosimetry of preclinical and translational studies may have contributed to a reproducibility crisis of radiobiological data in the field. Consequently, the development of a common terminology, as well as common recording, reporting, dosimetry, and metrology standards is required.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground And Purpose: The FLASH effect has been validated in different preclinical experiments with electrons (eFLASH) and protons (pFLASH) operating at an average dose rate above 40 Gy/s. However, no systematic intercomparison of the FLASH effect produced by eFLASHvs. pFLASH has yet been performed and constitutes the aim of the present study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground And Purpose: The FLASH effect has been validated in different preclinical experiments with electrons (eFLASH) and protons (pFLASH) operating at a mean dose rate above 40 Gy/s. However, no systematic intercomparison of the FLASH effect produced by e . pFLASH has yet been performed and constitutes the aim of the present study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAt the Center for Proton Therapy at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) the delivery of proton radiation is controlled via gas-based ionization chambers: the beam is turned off when a certain amount of preset charge has been collected. At low dose rates the charge collection efficiency in these detectors is unity, at ultra-high dose rates it is less due to induced charge recombination effects. If not corrected, the latter would lead to an overdosage.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To characterize an experimental setup for ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) proton irradiations, and to address the challenges of dosimetry in millimetre-small pencil proton beams.
Methods: At the PSI Gantry 1, high-energy transmission pencil beams can be delivered to biological samples and detectors up to a maximum local dose rate of ∼9000 Gy/s. In the presented setup, a Faraday cup is used to measure the delivered number of protons up to ultra-high dose rates.
In pencil beam scanning particle therapy, a short treatment delivery time is paramount for the efficient treatment of moving targets with motion mitigation techniques (such as breath-hold, rescanning, and gating). Energy and spot position change time are limiting factors in reducing treatment time. In this study, we designed a universal and dynamic energy modulator (ridge filter, RF) to broaden the Bragg peak, to reduce the number of energies and spots required to cover the target volume, thus lowering the treatment time.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe physico-chemical and biological response to conventional and UHDR electron and proton beams was investigated, along with conventional photons. The temporal structure and nature of the beam affected both, with electron beam at ≥1400 Gy/s and proton beam at 0.1 and 1260 Gy/s found to be isoefficient at sparing zebrafish embryos.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: The use of motion mitigation techniques such as breath-hold can reduce the dosimetric uncertainty of lung cancer proton therapy. We studied the feasibility of pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy field delivery within a single breath-hold at PSI's Gantry 2.
Methods: In PBS proton therapy, the delivery time for a field is determined by the beam-on time and the dead time between proton spots (the time required to change the energy and/or lateral position).
Nanoparticle-based radioenhancement is a promising strategy for extending the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy. While (pre)clinical results are encouraging, sound mechanistic understanding of nanoparticle radioenhancement, especially the effects of nanomaterial selection and irradiation conditions, has yet to be achieved. Here, we investigate the radioenhancement mechanisms of selected metal oxide nanomaterials (including SiO, TiO, WO and HfO), TiN and Au nanoparticles for radiotherapy utilizing photons (150 kVp and 6 MV) and 100 MeV protons.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: In proton therapy, the gantry, as the final part of the beamline, has a major effect on beam intensity and beam size at the isocenter. Most of the conventional beam optics of cyclotron-based proton gantries have been designed with an imaging factor between 1 and 2 from the coupling point (CP) at the gantry entrance to the isocenter (patient location) meaning that to achieve a clinically desirable (small) beam size at isocenter, a small beam size is also required at the CP. Here we will show that such imaging factors are limiting the emittance which can be transported through the gantry.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: Energy changes in pencil beam scanning proton therapy can be a limiting factor in delivery time, hence, limiting patient throughput and the effectiveness of motion mitigation techniques requiring fast irradiation. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of performing fast and continuous energy modulation within the momentum acceptance of a clinical beamline for proton therapy.
Methods: The alternative use of a local beam degrader at the gantry coupling point has been compared with a more common upstream regulation.
Purpose: In proton therapy, the potential of using high-dose rates in the cancer treatment is being explored. High-dose rates could improve efficiency and throughput in standard clinical practice, allow efficient utilization of motion mitigation techniques for moving targets, and potentially enhance normal tissue sparing due to the so-called FLASH effect. However, high-dose rates are difficult to reach when lower energy beams are applied in cyclotron-based proton therapy facilities, because they result in large beam sizes and divergences downstream of the degrader, incurring large losses from the cyclotron to the patient position (isocenter).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: The purpose of this work was to provide a flexible platform for FLASH research with protons by adapting a former clinical pencil beam scanning gantry to irradiations with ultra-high dose rates.
Methods: PSI Gantry 1 treated patients until December 2018. We optimized the beamline parameters to transport the 250 MeV beam extracted from the PSI COMET accelerator to the treatment room, maximizing the transmission of beam intensity to the sample.
Recently, proton therapy treatments delivered with ultra-high dose rates have been of high scientific interest, and the Faraday cup (FC) is a promising dosimetry tool for such experiments. Different institutes use different FC designs, and either a high voltage guard ring, or the combination of an electric and a magnetic field is employed to minimize the effect of secondary electrons. The authors first investigate these different approaches for beam energies of 70, 150, 230 and 250 MeV, magnetic fields between 0 and 24 mT and voltages between -1000 and 1000 V.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe response of AlO:C optically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLDs) was investigated in a 250 MeV pencil proton beam. The OSLD response was mapped for a wide range of average dose rates up to 9000 Gy s, corresponding to a ∼150 kGy sinstantaneous dose rate in each pulse. Two setups for ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) experiments are presented, which enable OSLDs or biological samples to be irradiated in either water-filled vials or cylinders.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBoron carbide is a material proposed as an alternative to graphite for use as an energy degrader in proton therapy facilities, and is favoured due to its mechanical robustness and promise to give lower lateral scattering for a given energy loss. However, the mean excitation energy of boron carbide has not yet been directly measured. Here we present a simple method to determine the mean excitation energy by comparison with the relative stopping power in a water phantom, and from a comparison between experimental data and simulations we derive a value for it of 83.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Cyclotron-based proton therapy facilities use an energy degrader of variable thickness to deliver beams of the different energies required by a patient treatment plan; scattering and straggling in the degrader give rise to an inherent emittance increase and subsequent particle loss in the downstream energy-selection system (ESS). Here we study alternative graphite degrader geometries and examine with Monte-Carlo simulations the induced emittance growth and consequent particle transmission.
Methods: We examined the conventional multiple-wedge degrader used in the Paul Scherrer Institute PROSCAN proton therapy system, the equivalent parallel-sided degrader, and a single block degrader of equivalent thickness.
The literature is controversial about the scan direction dependency of interplay effects in pencil beam scanning (PBS) treatment of moving targets. A directional effect is supported by many simulation studies, whereas the experimental data are mostly limited to simple geometries, not reflecting realistically clinical treatment plans. We have compared increasingly complex treatment fields, from a homogeneous single energy layer to a more modulated lung plan, under identical experimental settings, seeking evidence for differences in motion mitigation due to the selection of primary scanning direction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: Fast energy switching is of fundamental importance to implement motion mitigation techniques in pencil beam scanning proton therapy, allowing efficient irradiation and high patient throughput. However, depending on magnet design, when switching between different energy layers, eddy currents arise in the bending magnets' yoke, damping the speed of the magnetic field change and lengthening the settling time of the magnetic field. In a proton therapy gantry, this can cause a temporary displacement of the beam trajectory and consequently an incorrect beam position in the bending direction, resulting in an unacceptable loss of position precision at isocenter.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTherapeutic pencil beams are typically scanned using one of the following three techniques: spot scanning, raster scanning or line scanning. While providing similar dose distributions to the target, these three techniques can differ significantly in their delivery time sequence. Thus, we can expect differences in effectiveness and time efficiency when trying to mitigate interplay effects using rescanning.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLine scanning represents a faster and potentially more flexible form of pencil beam scanning than conventional step-and-shoot irradiations. It seeks to minimize dead times in beam delivery whilst preserving the possibility of modulating the dose at any point in the target volume. Our second generation proton gantry features irradiations in line scanning mode, but it still lacks a dedicated monitoring and validation system that guarantees patient safety throughout the irradiation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Phys J C Part Fields
January 2015
The jet energy scale (JES) and its systematic uncertainty are determined for jets measured with the ATLAS detector using proton-proton collision data with a centre-of-mass energy of [Formula: see text] TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of [Formula: see text][Formula: see text]. Jets are reconstructed from energy deposits forming topological clusters of calorimeter cells using the anti-[Formula: see text] algorithm with distance parameters [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text], and are calibrated using MC simulations. A residual JES correction is applied to account for differences between data and MC simulations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThis Letter presents a search for quantum black-hole production using 20.3 fb-1 of data collected with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at the LHC at √s = 8 TeV. The quantum black holes are assumed to decay into a final state characterized by a lepton (electron or muon) and a jet.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF