Publications by authors named "Priyanka Kashelkar"

Purpose: To evaluate clinical presentation of chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), laterality of presentation, and longitudinal changes in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Methods: This is a retrospective longitudinal analysis of 60 eyes from 30 patients who had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Demographic characteristics, clinical history, comorbidities, and other organ involvements were taken into account for analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the Palm Scan VF2000Ⓡ Virtual Reality Visual Field Analyzer compared to the HumphreyⓇ Field Analyzer for detecting and classifying glaucoma severity.
  • Results showed the Palm Scan had 100% sensitivity and specificity for identifying glaucoma, but there were notable misclassifications of glaucoma severity, especially with moderate cases.
  • The conclusion suggests that while the Palm Scan is effective for screening glaucoma, it is not yet reliable enough to replace the Humphrey Field Analyzer for managing patient care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of three newer generation formulae (Barrett Universal II, EVO, Hill-RBF 2.0) for calculation of power of two standard IOLs-the Acrysof IQ and Tecnis ZCB00 across all axial lengths.

Methods: In this retrospective series, 206 eyes of 206 patients, operated for cataract surgery with above two IOLs over the last 6 months, were included in the study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The present study compared visual outcomes in eyes with bilateral implantation of two multifocal intraocular lenses (MFIOLs)-the Eyecryl™ ACTV diffractive multifocal IOL (group 1) and AcrySof IQ ReSTOR multifocal IOL (group 2).

Methods: This was a prospective, two-group observational longitudinal study of 118 eyes from 59 patients conducted at Laxmi Eye Institute, Panvel, India. We evaluated the patients at 1, 3, and 6 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF