Influence of the hydraulic retention time on the removal of emerging contaminants in an anoxic-aerobic algal-bacterial photobioreactor coupled with anaerobic digestion.

This work evaluated, for the first time, the performance of an integral microalgae-based domestic wastewater treatment system composed of an anoxic reactor and an aerobic photobioreactor, coupled with an anaerobic digester for converting the produced algal-bacterial biomass into biogas, with regards to the removal of 16 contaminants of emerging concern (CECs): penicillin G, tetracycline, enrofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole, tylosin, trimethoprim, dexamethasone, ibuprofen, naproxen, acetaminophen, diclofenac, progesterone, carbamazepine, triclosan and propylparaben. The influence of the hydraulic retention time (HRT) in the anoxic-aerobic bioreactors (4 and 2.5 days) and in the anaerobic digester (30 and 10 days) on the fate of these CECs was investigated.

Integration of algae-based sewage treatment with anaerobic digestion of the bacterial-algal biomass and biogas upgrading.

The domestic sewage treatment performance of an integrated anoxic-aerobic photobioreactor with biomass settling and recycling, coupled with anaerobic digestion of the produced bacterial-algal biomass and biogas upgrading in the photobioreactor was investigated. Hydraulic retention time in the photobioreactor initially was 4 days (stage I and II) and then reduced to 2.5 days (stage III).

Evaluation of biomethanization during co-digestion of thermally pretreated microalgae and waste activated sludge, and estimation of its kinetic parameters.

The maximum methane yield that can be obtained from anaerobic co-digestion of microalgae and waste activated sludge (WAS) mixtures, after thermal pretreatment at 65 °C during 4 h, was investigated. Furthermore, the fitting of the experimental data by five kinetic models (first-order, second-order, modified Gompertz, Logistic, and two-substrate) was evaluated. Thermal pretreatment increased the methane yield of single microalgae and WAS digestion by ≈ 44 and by ≈ 52%, respectively.