Publications by authors named "Pongsakorn Apinsathanon"
Article Synopsis
- The study aimed to examine how different finish lines impact the ability of polyether and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials to penetrate a simulated gingival sulcus.
- Three types of finish lines (chamfer, deep chamfer, and radial shoulder) were tested with the impression materials using a two-step technique, with significant results determined through statistical analysis.
- Results showed that both the deep chamfer and radial shoulder finish lines allowed for better penetration of the impression materials compared to the chamfer finish line, and polyether performed better than polyvinyl siloxane.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare penetration ability and tensile strength among vinylsiloxanether (VSE), polyether (PE), and polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) elastomeric dental impression materials.
Materials And Methods: The models were constructed for penetration ability test by simulated gingival sulcus width and moist environment. The 0.