The purpose of this study was to evaluate and measure the microleakage inhibiting quality of provisional restorations manufactured using computer-aided manufacturing, 3D printing, and chairside molded provisional restorative materials. Fifteen provisional restorations each from 3D printed, milled, and chairside molded were manufactured. All restorations were cemented onto sintered zirconia abutment dies and adhered with zinc-oxide non-eugenol temporary cement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To measure the adhesion of the denture characterizing composite to heat-cured, CAD/CAM and 3D printed denture base resins.
Methods And Materials: Two different denture characterizing composites with different viscosities (SR Nexco; high viscosity (SR) and Kulzer Cre-active; low viscosity (K)) and three denture base resins (Heat cure, CAD-milled and 3D printed) were investigated. 60 beams (25 × 4 × 3 mm) were fabricated for each denture base resin; 30 were bonded to SR and 30 to K to form a beam 50 × 4 × 3 mm.
Purpose: To establish the fracture toughness (K ) and flexural bond strength of commercially available denture teeth to heat cured, CAD/CAM and 3D printed denture-based resins (DBRs).
Materials And Methods: Three types of DBRs (Heat cure, CAD-milled and 3D printed) and four different types of commercial denture teeth (Unfilled PMMA, double cross-linked PMMA, PMMA with nanofillers and 3D printed resin teeth) were investigated. DBR and epoxy embedded denture teeth (n = 30 per group) specimen beams (25 × 4 × 3 mm) were fabricated.