Publications by authors named "Pierre Largy"

Adults with phonological dyslexia and controls performed a lexical decision task while ERPs were recorded in the occipitotemporal pathway. Based on N170 durations, two subgroups were formed: dysl1 showing longer N170 durations and dysl2 showing normal N170 durations. While the dysl1 subgroup had poorer accuracy for infrequent words and pseudo-words, the dysl2 group responded more slowly than controls to pseudo-words.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

It is claimed by Totereau, Thévenin & Fayol (1997) that French children understand the rule for spelling the plural inflection very early on. However, no evidence contradicts the alternative that they learn the spelling of a word's singular and plural forms by treating the two forms as entirely different words. We tested this by asking French first and second graders (85 six-year-old and 89 seven-year-old children, respectively) to read and write rare words, either in just the singular or in just the plural, and then testing their spelling.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In order to investigate the neuroanatomical chronometry of word processing, two experiments using: Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) have been performed. The first one was designed to test the effects of orthographic, phonologic, and lexical properties of linguistic items on the pre-semantic components of ERPs during a passive reading task and massive repetition used to reduce familiarity effect between words and nonwords. In a second study, the level of familiarity was investigated by varying stimulus repetition and frequency in a lexical decision task.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates how children and adults approach the revision of grammatical errors in writing, specifically focusing on different cognitive processes involved in detecting agreement errors.
  • The research predicts that children will utilize a slower, more methodical process, while adults will rely on a quicker, automated one.
  • Findings reveal that younger participants struggle with plausibility in sentence structure, leading them to take longer to identify errors, whereas older participants are more influenced by grammatical form rather than plausibility, indicating a shift to a faster decision-making strategy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF