Publications by authors named "Phil Klose"

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to compare the accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements from traditional oscillometric methods and a finger-cuff technology (Nexfin®) against the gold standard invasive arterial pressure (IAP) in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
  • Measurements were taken at various perioperative stages, and the results showed a significant positive correlation between both NIBP and Nexfin® versus IAP, with Nexfin® usually providing more accurate readings.
  • Ultimately, while both non-invasive methods demonstrated high concordance rates in blood pressure trending, Nexfin® yielded lower percentage errors compared to NIBP, indicating it may be a better option for
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Elderly patients aged ≥65 years represent a growing population in the perioperative field, particularly orthopedic and vascular surgery. The higher degree of age-related or comorbid-dependent vascular alterations renders these patients at risk for hemodynamic complications and likely denote a possible limitation for modern, non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring devices. The aim was to compare vascular unloading technique-derived to invasive measurements of systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in elderly perioperative patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery, the combination of obesity-related comorbidities, pneumoperitoneum and extreme posture changes constitutes a high risk of perioperative hemodynamic complications. Thus, an advanced hemodynamic monitoring including continuous cardiac index (CI) assessment is desirable. While invasive catheterization may bear technical difficulties, transesophageal echocardiography is contraindicated due to the surgical procedure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF