Publications by authors named "Peipert J"

Rationale & Objective: Valid measures of side effects are important to inform clinical use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). This study sought to develop and establish the content validity of a PRO measure to capture side effects among kidney transplant recipients taking CNIs.

Study Design: Qualitative interviews for concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Financial toxicity (FT) has been linked to higher symptom burden and poorer clinical outcomes for patients with cancer. Despite the availability of validated tools to measure FT, a simple screen remains an unmet need. We evaluated item 12 ("My illness has been a financial hardship to my family and me") of the COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) measure as a single-item FT screening measure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study focuses on evaluating two patient-reported outcome measures for people with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), specifically the PROMIS Physical Function short form and the NSCLC Symptom Assessment Questionnaire.
  • Data were derived from two clinical trials involving a total of 915 participants, assessing the reliability, validity, and thresholds for meaningful changes in these measures.
  • The findings showed that both measures are reliable and valid for clinical use, with specific thresholds identified for meaningful changes: a decrease of 6-7 points for PROMIS PF-SF indicating worsening physical function and an increase of 2-3 points for NSCLC-SAQ indicating worsening symptoms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Fluid overload is a source of substantial morbidity for adults and children with nephrotic syndrome (NS). Preparation and Rationale for a Fluid Overload in Nephrotic Syndrome Clinical Outcomes Assessment Set for Drug Development (Prepare-NS, 5UG3FD007308) was funded by the US Food and Drug Administration to develop a core set of patient-reported and observer-reported (for young children) outcome measures of fluid overload for use in pharmaceutical trials across the lifespan.

Methods: The Prepare-NS study team developed the proposed context of use with input from stakeholders.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Early phase clinical trials focus on evaluating the safety and tolerability of new therapies, primarily using investigator and lab results rather than patient feedback.
  • A recent expert roundtable brought together 22 stakeholders to discuss the need for a universal patient-reported outcomes (PRO) model in early phase trials and how to effectively incorporate PROs to assess tolerability and guide treatment decisions.
  • The discussions yielded key recommendations and identified priority areas for further research on integrating patient feedback into early trials to improve safety and symptom management.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Interpretation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores has been supported by identifying score thresholds or ranges that indicate clinical importance. There has been a recent focus on the estimation of meaningful within patient change (MWPC). While much attention has been focused on anchor-based methods, some researchers prefer that a lower bound to these estimates should exceed a change score that could be observed due to measurement error alone as a safeguard against misclassifying individual patients as changed when they have not.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The authors examined baseline physical functional (PF) impairment among cancer outpatients in the National Cancer Institute Cancer Moonshot study Northwestern University Improving the Management of Symptoms During and Following Cancer Treatment (NU IMPACT). They hypothesized that PF impairment, measured with the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) survey, would (1) be common and more prevalent for patients receiving treatment compared with no treatment and (2) differ across tumor types, independent of cancer continuum phase.

Methods: Adults who were diagnosed with cancer in NU IMPACT (n = 2273) were sampled, and their PROMIS-PF scores were compared across tumor types and cancer continuum (curative, noncurative, or no treatment), with scores ≤40 indicating moderate-severe impairment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * In a study of 2,184 LDCs at five transplant centers, 18.6% ended up donating, while 38.2% had modifiable reasons for stopping and 43.2% were found medically ineligible.
  • * Factors that increased likelihood of donation included discussing donation with the recipient beforehand, completing high school, and having a close relationship with the recipient; meanwhile, high anxiety levels, the importance of religion, and being Non-White were associated with lower donation rates
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Academic specialists in general obstetrics and gynecology are clinicians practicing the full breadth of the specialty while also contributing to medical education and scientific discovery. Residency programs in obstetrics and gynecology provide exposure to research training that is variable but frequently limited. This creates challenges for junior faculty and in many cases limits their research productivity, typically measured by published original research articles and grant funding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Financial hardship (FH) is a complex issue in cancer care, affecting material conditions, well-being, and coping behaviors. This study aimed to longitudinally examine FH, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and their associations while incorporating social determinants of health and health care cost covariates in a sample of patients diagnosed with cancer.

Methods: This prospective, longitudinal cohort study analyzed data from 2,305 participants from the Northwestern University Improving the Management of Symptoms during and following Cancer Treatment trial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Patients with head/neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) experience significant tumor- and treatment-related side effects. No efficient summary measure capturing the totality of side effect burden currently exists. We examined associations between a single patient-reported outcome (PRO) item evaluating side effect bother (FACT GP5, "I am bothered by side effects of treatment") with overall side effects in HNSCC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To assess the use of a co-designed patient-reported outcome (PRO) clinical dashboard and estimate its impact on shared decision-making (SDM) and symptomatology in adults with advanced cancer or chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Materials And Methods: We developed a clinical PRO dashboard within the Northwestern Medicine Patient-Reported Outcomes system, enhanced through co-design involving 20 diverse constituents. Using a single-group, pretest-posttest design, we evaluated the dashboard's use among patients with advanced cancer or CKD between June 2020 and January 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Regulatory guidance suggests capturing patient-reported overall side effect impact in cancer trials. We examined whether the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) GP5 item ("I am bothered by side effects of treatment") post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy differed between oxaliplatin vs. non- oxaliplatin arms in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) R-04 trial of stage II-III rectal cancer patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Shared decision making (SDM) involves patients and clinicians collaborating to make informed healthcare choices, with clinical dashboards providing valuable information like patient-reported outcomes to enhance this process.
  • A co-design initiative was executed over 14 sessions with multidisciplinary teams, including patients, care partners, and clinicians, aiming to develop a PRO-informed clinical dashboard tailored for patients with advanced cancer or chronic kidney disease (CKD).
  • The co-design strategy showed strong success in its implementation, with high observer-rated fidelity and adoption scores, along with robust stakeholder representation, confirming its effectiveness in promoting SDM in these patient populations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a frequent complication of cirrhosis, leading to preventable hospitalizations and increased mortality. Despite the availability of validated neuro-psychometric tests to diagnose HE, only 10% of clinicians regularly screen for HE due to lack of time, equipment, and trained personnel.

Materials And Methods: We studied the association between patient-reported cognitive function and the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery (a validated measure of HE) in patients with cirrhosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Biosimilar drugs provide cost-effective yet clinically indistinguishable replications of target drugs. During initial development, this class of biologic medicines was expected to revolutionize pharmaceutical markets; however, following US Food and Drug Administration approval of the first biosimilar drug in 2015, the commercialization of biosimilars has been limited. The lack of biosimilar use may be especially salient in oncology, given that biosimilar distribution in this particularly high-cost area of medicine would bring savings on the order of many billions of dollars.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study investigates the link between a specific patient-reported outcome (the GP5 assessment from a cancer therapy scale) and early treatment discontinuation due to side effects in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
  • - Conducted between February and April 2023, the research analyzed responses from participants in the ECOG-ACRIN E1A11 trial, focusing on treatment regimens involving bortezomib and carfilzomib, with assessments taken at various intervals during treatment.
  • - Results from logistic regression will highlight whether higher reported bother from adverse events correlates with a higher likelihood of discontinuing treatment early, adjusting for factors like treatment type, patient demographics, and disease stage.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: As patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) become available to clinicians for routine clinical decision-making, many wonder how to define a meaningful change in a patient's PROM score. Some PROMs have a specific threshold that indicates meaningful change, but since those numbers are based on population averages, they do not necessarily apply to the varying experiences of each individual patient. Rather than viewing this as a weakness of PROMs, it is worth considering how clinicians use other existing measures in clinical decision-making-and whether PROMs can be used similarly.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in healthcare research to provide evidence of the benefits and risks of interventions from the patient perspective and to inform regulatory decisions and health policy. The use of PROs in clinical practice can facilitate symptom monitoring, tailor care to individual needs, aid clinical decision-making and inform value-based healthcare initiatives. Despite their benefits, there are concerns that the potential burden on respondents may reduce their willingness to complete PROs, with potential impact on the completeness and quality of the data for decision-making.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Post-transplant health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is associated with health outcomes for kidney transplant (KT) recipients. However, pretransplant predictors of improvements in post-transplant HRQOL remain incompletely understood. Namely, important pretransplant cultural factors, such as experience of discrimination, perceived racism in healthcare, or mistrust of the healthcare system, have not been examined as potential HRQOL predictors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Regulatory agencies are promoting systematic collection of patient experience data, particularly patient-reported outcomes (PROs), in cancer trials to enhance regulatory decision-making.
  • There’s an increasing acknowledgment that understanding cancer treatment tolerability should involve the patients' perspectives, especially regarding side effects that may not be fully reported by clinicians.
  • Methodologies for evaluating patient-reported tolerability are being developed, but current methods remain largely descriptive, and inconsistencies in analyses and objectives of PROs present challenges for interpreting the results effectively.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Overactive bladder (OAB) can adversely affect health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and adherence to treatments; however, the extent of their association is unknown. This study sought to characterize Sleep Disturbance, Depression, Fatigue, and patient-reported medication adherence among adults with OAB in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this descriptive, observational study, patients completed patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of urinary symptoms, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep quality, and medication adherence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Epithelial cells are covered in carbohydrates (glycans). This glycan coat or "glycocalyx" interfaces directly with microbes, providing a protective barrier against potential pathogens. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a condition associated with adverse health outcomes in which bacteria reside in direct proximity to the vaginal epithelium.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF