The neurodegenerative disease protein aprataxin resolves abortive DNA ligation intermediates.

Ataxia oculomotor apraxia-1 (AOA1) is a neurological disorder caused by mutations in the gene (APTX) encoding aprataxin. Aprataxin is a member of the histidine triad (HIT) family of nucleotide hydrolases and transferases, and inactivating mutations are largely confined to this HIT domain. Aprataxin associates with the DNA repair proteins XRCC1 and XRCC4, which are partners of DNA ligase III and ligase IV, respectively, suggestive of a role in DNA repair.

Measurement of chromosomal DNA single-strand breaks and replication fork progression rates.

Chromosomal single-strand breaks (SSBs) are the most common lesions arising in cells, but are normally rapidly repaired by multiprotein complexes centered around the scaffold protein, XRCC1. Here, we describe protocols to measure chromosomal SSBs in cells and for recovering and identifying novel components of SSBR complexes in vitro and in vivo. We also describe an assay we employ to measure the rate of replication fork progression in mammalian/vertebrate cells in the presence or absence of DNA damage.

The ataxia-oculomotor apraxia 1 gene product has a role distinct from ATM and interacts with the DNA strand break repair proteins XRCC1 and XRCC4.

Ataxia-oculomotor apraxia 1 (AOA1) is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disease that is reminiscent of ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T). AOA1 is caused by mutations in the gene encoding aprataxin, a protein whose physiological function is currently unknown. We report here that, in contrast to A-T, AOA1 cell lines exhibit neither radioresistant DNA synthesis nor a reduced ability to phosphorylate downstream targets of ATM following DNA damage, suggesting that AOA1 lacks the cell cycle checkpoint defects that are characteristic of A-T.

XRCC3 and Rad51 modulate replication fork progression on damaged vertebrate chromosomes.

The mechanisms by which the progression of eukaryotic replication forks is controlled after DNA damage are unclear. We have found that fork progression is slowed by cisplatin or UV treatment in intact vertebrate cells and in replication assays in vitro. Fork slowing is reduced or absent in irs1SF CHO cells and XRCC3(-/-) chicken DT40 cells, indicating that fork slowing is an active process that requires the homologous recombination protein XRCC3.