Background: Imaging assessment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients in the angiosuite using cone beam CT (CBCT) has created increased interest since endovascular treatment became the first line therapy for proximal vessel occlusions. One of the main challenges of CBCT imaging in AIS patients is degraded image quality due to motion artifacts. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of motion artifacts in CBCT stroke imaging and the effectiveness of a novel motion artifact correction algorithm for image quality improvement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging of the brain can be performed in the angiography suite to support various neurovascular procedures. Relying on CBCT brain imaging solely, however, still lacks full diagnostic confidence due to the inferior image quality compared with CT and various imaging artifacts that persist even with modern CBCT.
Objective: To perform a detailed evaluation of image artifact improvement using a new CBCT protocol which implements a novel dual-axis 'butterfly' trajectory.
Purpose: Conventional cone-beam computed tomography CT (CBCT) provides limited discrimination between low-contrast tissues. Furthermore, it is limited to full-spectrum energy integration. A dual-energy CBCT system could be used to separate photon energy spectra with the potential to increase the visibility of clinically relevant features and acquire additional information relevant in a multitude of clinical imaging applications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: Cone beam CT (CBCT) imaging assessment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) in the angiosuite may improve stroke workflow and decrease time to recanalization. In order for this workflow to gain widespread acceptance, current CBCT imaging needs further development to improve image quality. Our study aimed to compare the image quality of a new CBCT protocol performed directly in the angiosuite with imaging from multidetector CT as a gold standard.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To compare liver coverage and tumor detectability by using preprocedural magnetic resonance (MR) images as a reference, as well as radiation exposure of cone-beam computed tomography (CT) with different rotational trajectories.
Materials And Methods: Fifteen patients (nine men and six women; mean age ± standard deviation, 65 years ± 5) with primary or secondary liver cancer were retrospectively included in this institutional review board-approved study. A modified cone-beam CT protocol was used in which the C-arm rotates from +55° to -185° (open arc cone-beam CT) instead of -120° to +120° (closed arc cone-beam CT).