Purpose: This article is aimed at comparing edge illumination (EI) x-ray phase contrast computed tomography (PCT) and conventional (attenuation-based) computed tomography (CT), based on their respective contrast and noise transfer.
Methods: The noise in raw projections obtained with EI PCT is propagated through every step of the data processing, including phase retrieval and tomographic reconstruction, leading to a description of the noise in the reconstructed phase tomograms. This is compared to the noise in corresponding attenuation tomograms obtained with CT.
Mammography is the primary imaging tool for screening and diagnosis of human breast cancers, but ~10-20% of palpable tumors are not detectable on mammograms and only about 40% of biopsied lesions are malignant. Here we report a high-resolution, low-dose phase contrast X-ray tomographic method for 3D diagnosis of human breast cancers. By combining phase contrast X-ray imaging with an image reconstruction method known as equally sloped tomography, we imaged a human breast in three dimensions and identified a malignant cancer with a pixel size of 92 μm and a radiation dose less than that of dual-view mammography.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA nontomography approach for the measurement of angular-dependent coherent-scatter cross section of x rays (E≃40-80 keV) is described. It is shown that an analyzer crystal, which is proposed to be used for the sampling of the cross section, simultaneously provides information about the location of the scattering volume inside the object. A numerical simulation demonstrates that this method can be applied for nondestructive analysis of an object's internal structure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMany mathematical methods have been so far proposed in order to separate absorption, refraction and ultra-small angle scattering information in phase-contrast analyzer-based images. These algorithms all combine a given number of images acquired at different positions of the crystal analyzer along its rocking curve. In this paper a comprehensive quantitative comparison between five of the most widely used phase extraction algorithms based on the geometrical optics approximation is presented: the diffraction-enhanced imaging (DEI), the extended diffraction-enhanced imaging (E-DEI), the generalized diffraction-enhanced (G-DEI), the multiple-image radiography (MIR) and the Gaussian curve fitting (GCF).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF