The aims of this case-control study were to: (1) Identify cartilage locations and volumes at risk of osteoarthritis (OA) using subject-specific finite element (FE) models; (2) Quantify the relationships between the simulated biomechanical parameters and T and T relaxation times of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We created subject-specific FE models for seven patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and six controls based on a previous proof-of-concept study. We identified locations and cartilage volumes susceptible to OA, based on maximum principal stresses and absolute maximum shear strains in cartilage exceeding thresholds of 7 MPa and 32%, respectively.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe purpose of this proof-of-concept study was to develop three-dimensional patient-specific mechanobiological knee joint models to simulate alterations in the fixed charged density (FCD) around cartilage lesions during the stance phase of the walking gait. Two patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructed knees were imaged at 1 and 3 years after surgery. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were used for segmenting the knee geometries, including the cartilage lesions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Finite element modelling can be used to evaluate altered loading conditions and failure locations in knee joint tissues. One limitation of this modelling approach has been experimental comparison. The aims of this proof-of-concept study were: 1) identify areas susceptible to osteoarthritis progression in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed patients using finite element modelling; 2) compare the identified areas against changes in T and T values between 1-year and 3-year follow-up timepoints.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUse of knee joint finite element models for diagnostic purposes is challenging due to their complexity. Therefore, simpler models are needed for studies where a high number of patients need to be analyzed, without compromising the results of the model. In this study, more complex, kinetic (forces and moments) and simpler, kinetic-kinematic (forces and angles) driven finite element models were compared during the stance phase of gait.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF