Objective: To determine the effectiveness of orthodontic treatment finalized on the maintenance/improvement the upper arch perimeter to assist in the successful eruption of palatally displaced maxillary canines (PDCs).
Materials And Methods: The randomized prospective design comprised 64 subjects with PDCs who were randomly assigned to one of three groups: cervical pull headgear (HG); rapid maxillary expansion and cervical pull headgear (RME/HG); or untreated control group (CG). Panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms were evaluated at the time of initial observation (T1) and after an average period of 18 months (T2).
This study evaluated the effectiveness of two interceptive approaches to palatally displaced canines (PDC), i.e. extraction of the primary canines alone or in association with the use of a cervical-pull headgear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe aim of this longitudinal cephalometric study was to analyze the growth characteristics of the mandible in subjects with infraocclusion of the mandibular deciduous molars. A group of 28 subjects with bilateral infraocclusion of mandibular deciduous molars (IG) were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal study on the growth characteristics of the mandible and compared with a control group (CG) of 28 subjects. Lateral cephalograms were collected in both groups at T1 and at T2, after a mean 19-month interval in the IG and after a mean 16-month interval in the CG.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThis study evaluated the effectiveness of two interceptive approaches to palatally displaced canines (PDCs), ie, extraction of the deciduous canines alone and in association with the use of a cervical pull headgear. The prospective longitudinal design of the investigation included 46 subjects with PDC (62 maxillary canines) who were randomly assigned to one of three groups (1) a group that underwent the extraction of the deciduous canine only, (2) a group that received in addition the use of a cervical pull headgear, and (3) an untreated control group. Panoramic radiographs were evaluated at initial observation (T1) and after an average period of 18 months (T2).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF