Publications by authors named "P Panel"
Article Synopsis
- The study compares two surgical methods—hysteroscopy and vacuum aspiration—for treating incomplete spontaneous abortions, with the goal of determining which method leads to better pregnancy outcomes for women planning to conceive in the future.* -
- Conducted as a randomized controlled trial with 574 participants across 15 French hospitals, the research specifically looked at pregnancies lasting at least 22 weeks over a two-year follow-up period.* -
- Results showed no significant difference in successful pregnancy rates between the two groups, with 62.8% from the hysteroscopy group and 67.6% from the vacuum aspiration group achieving the desired outcome, suggesting that neither method proved superior in promoting future fertility.*
Abdominal wall is a rare location for endometriosis, with a reported incidence of parietal endometriosis of approximately 0.03 to 0.4%.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNomogram for Predicting a Complex Ureteral Procedure in Pelvic Endometriosis Surgery.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
May 2022
Study Objective: To develop a nomogram for predicting the type of ureteral procedure in pelvic deep endometriosis (DE) surgery (1) and to describe the factors and complications associated with the ureteral procedure (2).
Design: Retrospective monocentric study of 920 patients who underwent surgery for pelvic DE between June 2009 and March 2020 in the gynecologic surgery department of the Versailles Hospital Center. The main criterion was evaluation of the ureteral procedure, classified as simple (isolation of the ureter) or complex (dissection of the ureter, segmental ureteral resection, or nephroureterectomy).
Objectives: To assess the value of a self-completed questionnaire based on patients' verbal descriptors of pelvic painful symptoms to identify women with endometriosis.
Design: Prospective 1:2 nonmatched case-control study.
Setting: Three French endometriosis referral centers.
Objectives: To study the measurement properties, the responsiveness and the minimal clinically important difference of the ENDOPAIN-4D: a new questionnaire for assessing pain in endometriosis.
Methods: A prospective, observational, multicentre study was conducted including all women ≥18 years consulting for symptomatic proven endometriosis between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2018 and volunteering to participate. Each patient had to answer a new self-administered patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires (the ENDOPAIN-4D) at inclusion (T0) and 12 months after medical or surgical treatment (T1).