Publications by authors named "P Lundgren"
Aim: To analyse the challenges faced by parents of extremely preterm infants born before 24 weeks of gestation and the potential buffering effect of perceived resources on the family's health continuum.
Methods: The qualitative data were obtained from 70 parents of 70 infants born before 24 weeks of gestation, through open-ended questions in a survey. An inductive content analysis was conducted to identify themes and patterns in the parents' experiences.
Background: Two risk factors for severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in extremely preterm infants are thrombocytopenia and low levels of arachidonic acid (AA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). To date, these risk factors have not been linked.
Method: Infants born < 28 weeks gestational age (GA) from 2016 to 2019 were randomized to postnatal enteral AA/DHA supplementation or standard care (controls).
Aim: To investigate the association between retinopathy of prematurity and autism spectrum disorder in extremely preterm children.
Methods: Data in children born extremely preterm at <28 weeks' gestational age in the Region Västra Götaland, 2013-2017, were analysed for association between retinopathy of prematurity and neurodevelopmental disorders. We focussed on autism spectrum disorder and excluded children with perinatal brain injuries or genetic disorders.
Article Synopsis
- Guidelines for cardiac arrest management were analyzed to assess the strength and quality of the evidence supporting them, revealing both strengths and significant gaps in knowledge.
- The review of the 2020 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines identified 254 recommendations, mostly classified under advanced life support (ALS) and basic life support (BLS), but only 1% of recommendations were based on the strongest level of evidence (LOE A).
- Only 32% of the highest class recommendations were backed by strong evidence (LOE A or B), highlighting the need for more rigorous research, especially randomized trials, to improve the quality of guidelines.
Background: This systematic review evaluates the effect of audit and feedback (A&F) interventions targeting antibiotic prescribing in primary care and examines factors that may explain the variation in effectiveness.
Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving A&F interventions targeting antibiotic prescribing in primary care were included in the systematic review. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.