Over the past decade, the development of modified instrumentation and navigation assistance (permitting in-situ bone excision) have stimulated advances in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty techniques. These techniques have been developed with an objective to reduce perioperative morbidity, hospitalization expenses, and total rehabilitation time. Furthermore, a concomitant increase in the promotion of these techniques by both industry and orthopaedic surgeons themselves has fueled patient demand.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground And Purpose: Antibiotic-impregnated cement is used as a spacer or during re-implantation surgery for the treatment of infected total hip arthroplasties. The routine use of antibiotic-impregnated cement during primary or uninfected revision total hip arthroplasty remains controversial. With this meta-analysis of the published literature, we intended to assess efficacy and safety in the use of antibiotic-impregnated cement for uninfected arthroplasty.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPatients with standard total hip arthroplasties may have reduced hip abduction and extension moments when compared with normal nonosteoarthritic hips. In comparison, patients after resurfacing total hip arthroplasty appear to have a near-normal gait. The authors evaluated temporal-spatial parameters, hip kinematics, and kinetics in hip resurfacing patients compared with patients with unilateral osteoarthritic hips and unilateral standard total hip arthroplasties.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF